SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill who wrote (708518)10/24/2005 10:17:24 AM
From: pompsander  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
As we all learned during Watergate, we are a nation of laws, not men. When it comes to laws on lying under oath, Perjury, etc., there is no distinction between individuals. Nowhere in the statute or case law does it say: "This law does not apply to person of a certain importance". There are defenses to some laws, such as executive privilege, but that defense did not apply to Clinton and it certainly does not apply to the fellows in trouble now.

All men are equal under the law. If not, let's go back to King George where the sovereign could not be charged with a crime.

Principled conservatives will agree with me, as they regularly ask not for new laws but that the laws on the books be used in an equitable manner.



To: Bill who wrote (708518)10/24/2005 6:03:48 PM
From: Peter Dierks  Respond to of 769667
 
Maybe Karl Rove should have shared a cigar with Valarie Plame before he allegedly passed along the information Tim Russert shared with him. Then Democrats would have to support him, because it would would just be about sex.