Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (45074)	10/24/2005 11:25:08 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 362489

We must occasionally take out a dictator. Like Milosovic or Mullah Omar or whomever's next. Saddam was on the list, just not at the top of the list. No connection to 9-11 and no recent atrocities. His atrocities were mostly back in the 80's when Reagan supported him. Still Saddam was a major irritation and potential threat going forward. Unlike Kaddafi he had not made overtures to cooperate with the world. He was too defiant. If we had waited and done it carefully though we could have removed him without occupying the country. BTW: there is one autocratic mis-leader we must take down next. His name is GW Bush. Starting with Cheney, Rove and DElay though.