Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (45138)	10/25/2005 12:18:47 AM
From: SiouxPal	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 362543

Is that your final answer to his post? Look at both again.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (45138)	10/25/2005 12:23:37 AM
From: SiouxPal	Respond to of 362543

You are doing a bad job of indicting John Kerry. I'm off to music. Not so mean a thing.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (45138)	10/25/2005 11:17:56 AM
From: American Spirit	Respond to of 362543

Yes, Kerry was prepared to defend this country, and he needed to make that clear to a country clamoring for revenge for 9-11. But only after taking much more time to fully inspect for WMD and to prepare in case of war AS A LAST RESORT. Finish Kerry's sentences please. You're like a Bushie taking one line out of context. So you see Kerry never would have invaded, because WMD never would have been found. If he had been president he would have frisked Saddam thoroughly, found nothing, then decided not to invade. Saddam could then have been squeezed and completely defanged so as not to be an imminent danger, and Kerry would have concentrated on Al Qaida and getting us off Arab oil. Kerry also would have gotten much more cooperation from the allies.