To: tejek who wrote (256993 ) 10/25/2005 10:09:09 AM From: combjelly Respond to of 1571898 "Are they saying they adjust the scores......kind of like doing the scoring on a curve?" Taro answered this pretty well. You get a raw score, but that can only be compared to others who take the exact same test. To make comparisons possible, they then normalize the tests, i.e. they curve. And they really curve, fitting the scores to a Bell curve or what ever they have determined as appropriate for the test, instead of just handing out some points like many instructors who "curve" do. Which brings up a point. The universities tell the testing bodies what type of students they want to attract. Med schools for example, want some bias towards students who don't have a biology or pre-med background. So the MCAT structures the test so that the biology wonks are lured into wrong answers. The GRE is not so bad about this, but be on the watch for complicated wording(they are trying to mislead you), "obvious" answers(they are trying to mislead you) or leading questions(they are trying to mislead you). For the analytical writing, it isn't important what you say as much as how you say it. The evaluators only spend a few minutes reading your work, so make it as easy as possible for them. Adopt a "thesis-antithesis-synthesis" approach, starting with a clear statement of what you are writing about. Use real examples to support your argument, don't make up stuff. Don't inject things like politics and keep it neutral, annoying the evaluator is not a winning strategy. Be sure your work is spelling and grammatically correct, errors can only hurt you. In summary, be extra careful on the first 10-15 questions in a given section, those will set the bulk of your score. Keep on your toes. Don't get misled.