Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Amy J who wrote (182467)	10/25/2005 6:19:56 PM
From: The Duke of URL©	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

I am not sure I should get emotional about it. I did get upset. There are many other news sources which had that same pro AMD bent. But maybe it is just a case of "man bites dog" instead of dog bites man. I don't recognize the WSJ as being particularly anti-Intel or pro AMD. In other words, the headline, "INTEL, THE COMPANY THAT CONTROLS THE ENTIRE CHIP MARKET TO THE POSSIBLE POINT OF BEING A MONOPOLY MAKES SLIGHT ADJUSTMENT IN CHIP THREE YEARS FROM NOW THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE IMPORTANT TO BLOW A LITTLE COMPETITOR OUT OF THE WATER" may not garner the many readers' interest as, "UNDERDOG STRUGGLES TO BE VICTORIOUS". :))

To: Amy J who wrote (182467)	10/25/2005 10:05:54 PM
From: Ali Chen	Respond to of 186894

"AMD has absolutely no product-line in the highend space. Yet WSJ incorrectly claims AMD does" I wonder who might be more correct, an official influential mouthpiece of investing community who's sources include dozens of professional market research firms, or "Amy.J"? Also, all these guys are in fact customers of those chips. Don't you remember the saying that a customer is always right? If WSJ says so, it is so, it is a highest benchmark, not TPS or SPECfp. "Scott McLaughlin's comment makes it clear the delays are not related to AMD" You want Intel to confirm WSJ opinion? That would be funny. - Ali