SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: NOW who wrote (708987)10/26/2005 6:26:43 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
Well assaulting a subordinate employee and then lying under oath about taking advantage of of young employee as part of denying guilt is as bad as it gets. And joe wilson outing his wife is disgusting if she really still was a CIA operative.

but wilson's exposed lies do not really rise to the level of mr. bill's lies and obstruction of justice.



To: NOW who wrote (708987)10/26/2005 6:31:01 PM
From: Wayners  Respond to of 769667
 
It depends on whether you do it in the office, on the Taxpayer's dime, and get caught by your Boss doing it. Only porn stars don't get fired for what Clinton did. If Clinton did it after hours at a nearby hotel or in the private residence, I couldn't care less, that's his business...but not in the workplace. He should have been fired just like any other American would have been fired from their job for getting caught having sex at work.



To: NOW who wrote (708987)10/26/2005 6:53:04 PM
From: Bill  Respond to of 769667
 
I imagine oral sex with a CIA operative might be a worse outing than adultery.



To: NOW who wrote (708987)10/27/2005 8:34:24 AM
From: HPilot  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
Nothing wrong with outing a CIA operative, its only NOA spies that are offered this protection. Wilson's wife was not NOA and not in any danger.



To: NOW who wrote (708987)10/27/2005 9:21:03 AM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
After much thought I believe that if any White house officials are indeed indicted by Fitzgerald for lying to the grand jury that after any convictions if the President does not remove them from office they should be impeached. Of course, every Democrat in the Senate will vote to acquit them, because they will want to be consistent. My position is consistent.



To: NOW who wrote (708987)10/28/2005 12:23:21 PM
From: paret  Respond to of 769667
 
That depends on the meaning of the word "is."