Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (4685)	10/27/2005 9:44:12 AM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541635

If there is perjury whose intention was to take us to war on false pretenses is equated with perjury based on some oversexed persons biblical definition of sex - we might just as well trivialize everything. You are confused. There was never any perjury whose intention was to take us to war. The only perjury under discussion relates to the possibility of perjury during the Fitzgerald investigation. You might recall that it began long after the war was launched. And perjury and its subornation are still crimes, whether or not, and perhaps especially if, the actor happens to be Prez.