Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (182476)	10/28/2005 2:19:36 PM
From: brushwud	Respond to of 186894

LOL! He has had it both ways for sometime now. Dan: "Intel is a Monopoly! But AMD is slaughtering them!" You and Amy J are harping on the idea that Intel is not a monopoly, and in the sense of "monopoly" meaning "one seller", that's true. But the Clayton Anti-Trust Act outlaws practices which would "tend to create a monopoly". So your point is a red herring.

To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (182476)	10/28/2005 5:18:18 PM
From: Amy J	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Brian, so true. On other news, economy did well, hurray! "Economic growth clocked in at a surprisingly strong 3.8 percent pace in the third quarter, reflecting brisk spending by consumers and businesses despite high energy prices" news.yahoo.com Americans keep spending, hurray! (on the otherhand, maybe that's not so good.) China has a 50% savings rate so why doesn't Intel sell INTC to China? I would certainly bet INTC is much better to buy than USD, at this point. Am beginning to wonder if Bryant is being aggressive enough when it comes to selling Intc overseas. Intel's brandname is extremely popular overseas so why isn't Bryant taking advantage of that. Why don't they tack on the box one INTC stock certificate for every computer they sell in China, to get some more shareholders interested in INTC rather than having them buy so much USD. Regards, Amy J