To: American Spirit who wrote (69168 ) 10/30/2005 9:16:51 PM From: Dan B. Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568 Re: "It's proven the rightwing lied about Clinton putting out al those preposterous stories about him murdering and drug-running." Show me! Re: "You cannot cherry-pick one and say it's true just because you like the feel of it." He lost in court, and you admit he did what he denied despite the honest testimony given by women involved. I've a pretty good feel for the meaning of that, though perhaps you don't and we should leave it at that. However, 'twas you who persisted in referencing "rape" charges, and my expressed opinion of Jaunita's story (the only woman with a rape charge against Clinton of whom I'm aware) was prompted by you, not cherry-picked by me. I have the evidence surrounding several others to solidly refute you unfounded claims without cherry-picking a thing. Re: "all those bimbos were paid." Evidence man. Out with it. Re: "Nothing they said about Kerry, McCain, Wilson or Clinton was true except what is proven established fact One would imagine some things which aren't proven established fact might well be true once in a while, or is it just me? More to the point, by the rules of logic, when we know something is not proven, this does not indicate it is false. I do like your stipulation though...surely since you named Clinton, it applies to a couple of "bimbos (as you would have it - and what's good for the goose....)" who were proven to be honest in core instances. Follow this: If they in fact were proven honest (and they were, per proven established fact), then IF they were paid, indeed they could could not in these instances have been paid to lie. Hence we have no indication that they were paid, unless it was to tell the truth (ok by me, you?). Dan B.