SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dennis Roth who wrote (52710)10/31/2005 6:54:15 PM
From: falconflingagain  Respond to of 206086
 
Uno:
My thanks to those of you who have sent me private replies in the past. I just now realized I had them, and my peon status with S.I. doesn't allow me to private reply. In the fwiw dept. I too was a multiyear poster {on the old Motleyfool OSX board and made megabucks on FLC (and lost same in pharms...duh!)}: Does ANYone know a L.A. Foster (his post name). He sure was an education in the magic arts of drilling offshore (and explaining it to morons as I).

Dos:
While I would be the last one in the world to try and use T.A. at this point, it does seem that the OSX is following the T.A. mentioned recently in RJames (..no pain, no gain).
although it looks like the same premise could also allow for a nosedive down just to make the overall upward line nice and straight.

Tres: Winter draws nigh. Whether you believe in any or all of the various hypotheses propounded on this and all the other boards, the test is near. As for me I'm about 25% cash and going to dip in a bit more into probably gsf and rig when possible, and reduce my oil sands position a bit...just because its too heavy, and I ought to know better by now.

Have a safe Halloween



To: Dennis Roth who wrote (52710)1/30/2006 10:45:47 AM
From: Dennis Roth  Respond to of 206086
 
Chevron (IL/A): Shares theoretically inexpensive, but reality that another E&P acquisition may be needed could keep shares under pressure - Goldman Sachs - January 29, 2006
Message 22113177