SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Supreme Court Nominations -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (276)11/7/2005 1:26:40 PM
From: redfish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 292
 
I am very much in favor of states rights over federal rights myself.

I don't see how a contrary position holds water given the clear intent of the framers of the constitution, and given the language of the constitution itself.

Imo expanding the reach of the federal government has been a disaster ... what can we honestly say that the federal government does for us, as compared to state and local governments?

It gave us a military larger than that of the next 40 largest militaries combined ... gave us a pointless war in Iraq ... gave us debt to the gills ... gave us a pointless war on drugs ... gave us innumerable unfunded mandates that burden states and localities.

Given a choice between the federal government running Florida, or Floridians running Florida, I strongly prefer the latter.



To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (276)12/23/2005 7:41:44 PM
From: ChinuSFO  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 292
 
Alito is looking worse than Robert Bork as each day goes by.

Alito defended government wiretap rights
Reagan-era memo said attorney general should be immune from lawsuits

Kauren Victoria Burke / AP
Updated: 6:34 p.m. ET Dec. 23, 2005

WASHINGTON - Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito defended the right of government officials to order domestic wiretaps when he worked for the Reagan Justice Department, documents released Friday show.

...contd at msnbc.msn.com