To: mishedlo who wrote (40377 ) 11/1/2005 11:21:36 AM From: Incitatus Respond to of 116555 The hedge fund industry has grown rapidly in recent years, by one estimate going from an estimated $500 Billion in assets under management in 2001 to around $1.3 Trillion today. The rise in popularity of hedge funds is similar to that of technology stocks in the late 1990s and more recently the rise in popularity of real estate investment. Not in the slightest. Hedge funds are successful based upon their success in trading, not the total amount that flows in. The more money that flows into stocks or RE, the higher the prices go, spurring even more money into those assets. But money into hedge funds (as opposed to mutual funds or other stock investments) does not create self-fulfilling returns for the hedgies.In all three areas a speculative bubble formed as the initial success of savvy early investors attracted large numbers of new players into the field. The rush of new capital helped fuel additional success stories and eventually distorted asset prices far beyond reasonable levels. To the contrary, the additions of new hedge funds has resulted in lower overall hedge fund returns because the quality of management has declined.As more investors and creditors piled into certain classes of hedge funds it created great short term gains for most investors involved in the stampede. This is theoretically possible. That is, funds could hold the same stocks and, with more money coming in, purchase more of the same stocks, creating a snowball effect. I think this happened with a mutual fund Janus Twenty. However, the stampede into hedge funds has resulted in worse overall results, not improved results. The hedge fund bubble now seems to have passed its peak. HedgeFundReasearch.com has an index that attempts to measure the returns of the entire global hedge fund universe, as well as many strategy specific indices. According to their records, hedge funds returned an average of 13.39% in 2003 but returns averaged just 2.69% in 2004. As of 10/28/05, the year to date return was -0.97%, with October showing -2.36% on its own. This proves my point. The alleged "bubble" in hedge funds is not a bubble at all. A flood of mediocre analysts, and friends and children of the rich, starting hedge funds and making wrong guesses is not going to result in superior returns. No more than doubling the number of NFL teams would result in superior results from the "stampede." When exactly did the big spike in hedge funds result in superior returns for investors?All seven of HFR's main strategy indices were down for the most recent 4-week period, ranging from -0.29% to -3.55%. The decline in returns was predictable, given the state of the industry and the current economic climate. Hedge funds aren't supposed to lose money in a poor economic environment. They are supposed to do well no matter what direction the market goes.Going forward, average hedge fund performance is likely to get much worse. Profitable strategies have become money loosing strategies, but money continues to pour into hedge funds, masking much of the damage that has already been done while creating the potential for even greater damage. When many types of hedge trades are unwound the funds that are last to exit will take the worst damage. The highly leveraged nature of many hedge funds means that small losses can be rapidly magnified and can force funds to liquidate their positions at a sizable loss. If the poor results of the newer funds cause the funds to go under and cause investors to lose interest, we could see the number of funds decrease. With only the competent funds left, the average hedge fund results should improve.It is hard to predict how much damage will be done as the hedge fund bubble deflates. The market didn't move much as all these hedge funds came into existence, so there probably won't be much happening when they drop out.