Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Right Wing Extremist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Oral Roberts who wrote (51529)	11/1/2005 12:38:22 PM
From: paret	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 59480

Do you run this thread?

To: Oral Roberts who wrote (51529)	11/1/2005 4:50:42 PM
From: Hope Praytochange	Respond to of 59480

Democratic Judge Is Removed From DeLay Case By RALPH BLUMENTHAL and MARIA NEWMAN AUSTIN, Tex., Nov. 1 - A Texas court agreed today that a Democratic judge should be removed from Representative Tom Delay's criminal trial because of the judge's contributions to Democratic candidates and causes. The decision came this afternoon after several hours of testimony in which Mr. Delay's lawyer, Dick DeGuerin, said that the contributions by the judge in the case, Bob Perkins of the 331st Judicial Criminal District Court, would create questions "in the minds of reasonable people" that he could not rule impartially. Mr. Delay is charged with money laundering and conspiracy, and he was forced to step down as the Republican majority leader in the United States House of Representatives. The judge in today's hearing, C.W. Duncan, did not immediately indicate who would replace Judge Perkins in the criminal trial nor when the trial would get started. Judge Perkins had declined to recuse himself from the case. During the hearing, Mr. DeGuerin said he was not accusing the judge of any wrongdoing for making 34 contributions to Democratic and liberal groups since 2000. Texas law says that because judges are elected in that state, they can contribute to candidates and political parties. But Mr. DeGuerin and several witnesses who testified today on behalf of Mr. Delay cited a state statute that said a judge "shall recuse himself in cases where his impartiality might reasonably be questioned, or if he has a personal bias or prejudice in the case." "I think both are clearly triggered here," John L. Hill, Jr., a former Texas Supreme Court justice, testified. "It's very clear cut," the judge said. "We should have another judge in this case." Records presented by Mr. Delay's defense team show that the judge donated a total of $5,255 to the Texas Democratic party and the liberal group MoveOn.org from 2000 to 2005, but none of the contributions were made after Mr. Delay was indicted. Mr. DeGuerin said that under the statute, "a reasonable person has to be convinced" of a judge's impartiality. "The public perception of Judge Perkins's activities shows him to be on opposite sides of the political fence than Tom DeLay," DeGuerin said, according to The Associated Press. A prosecutor in the case, Rick Reed, said that Mr. DeLay's lawyers must prove, not speculate, that a member of the public would have a "reasonable doubt that the judge is impartial" in order to get the judge removed from the case. "Judges are presumed to be impartial," Mr. Reed said, according to The A.P. Mr. DeLay was in the courtroom accompanied by his wife, Christine. He smiled as he walked past journalists outside the hearing room but did not speak. Mr. DeLay is accused of money laundering and conspiracy in a scheme that, prosecutors say, funneled thousands of dollars in corporate donations to Republican legislative candidates in 2002 in Texas in violation of the state's century-old ban on corporate money in state campaigns. He has said he is not guilty of any of the charges and will be exonerated. Ralph Blumenthal reported from Austin, Tex., for this article, and Maria Newman from New York.