Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (710293)	11/1/2005 3:34:21 PM
From: Bill	Respond to of 769670

What makes you say that?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (710293)	11/1/2005 3:34:52 PM
From: HPilot	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

Actually an UZI in every cupboard would be nice!

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (710293)	11/1/2005 4:00:15 PM
From: Wayners	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

False, Gun Control Act governs, and FULLY regulates ALL firearms whether they are a .22 single shot or a machine gun...only law abiding citizens, who register and aren't alcoholics, adjudicated mentally defective, who live in States that allow MG ownership, who aren't non resident aliens, who aren't guilty of domestic violence, and who can PASS and FBI Background check can POSSESS any firearm. If MGs are so dangerous, why do the police demand that they have them? The police don't need them to go duck hunting do they?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (710293)	11/1/2005 4:12:39 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769670

Bill, I said it because Judge Alito, in a dissenting opinion, said the federal government does not have the power to regulate machine gun possession under the commerce clause.