Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockman_scott who wrote (46596)	11/1/2005 4:58:10 PM
From: redfish	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 361839

Imo today was the end of Frist as a politician. He was in plenty of hot water as things stood, but looking like a fool in public is someone no politician can recover from. The Bushites had started recovering a tiny bit of mo but Harry Reid pulled the rug out from under them ... a very bold move. Now the other dems have to rally around Harry.

To: stockman_scott who wrote (46596)	11/1/2005 5:09:35 PM
From: SiouxPal	Respond to of 361839

Open the Door, Richard: Kristof Again Presses Cheney to Explain or Resign By E&P Staff Published: November 01, 2005 9:55 AM ET editorandpublisher.com NEW YORK Nicholas Kristof, the New York Times columnist who has long been skeptical of criminal wrongdoing in the Plame/CIA leak case, continued pressing Vice President Cheney to come clean in his Tuesday column. He had first made this plea in his Sunday column. "So, Mr. Cheney, tell us what happened," Kristof writes today. "If you're afraid to say what you knew, and when you knew it, then you should resign." He notes, "Five lawyers I've consulted all agree that there is no compelling legal reason why you should not discuss the situation....As it is, you're pleading 'no contest' in the court of public opinion, and that's painful for all of us who want to believe in the integrity of our government." He then lists a series of specific questions Cheney ought to answer, including: --Did you ask Libby to undertake his inquiries about Ambassador Joseph Wilson? --Why did you independently ask the C.I.A. for information about the Wilsons? --Did you know that Wilson's wife was a covert officer? "The indictment states that you knew she worked in the C.I.A.'s counter- proliferation division," Kristof observes." You would think that anyone as steeped in intelligence issues as you are would know that meant she worked in the Directorate of Operations and was perhaps a spook's spook." --Did you advise Libby to leak information about Mrs. Wilson's work in the C.I.A. to journalists? --When Libby made his statements in the inquiry - allegedly committing perjury - were you aware of what he was saying? "Mr. Libby rode to work with you almost every morning," Kristof notes, "but this topic never came up?"