Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (710403)	11/1/2005 6:48:50 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 769667

considering what happened to miller, why would say russett had no reason to deny saying what Libby attributed to him.

To: Bill who wrote (710403)	11/1/2005 6:53:17 PM
From: Orcastraiter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Libby is charged with perjury and obstruction of justice. Given that fact, he's still innocent until proven guilty. The pattern of lies all point to Libby, and I see why Fitzgerald indicted him. Fitzgerald tried to find the truth in this case. But as he said it was difficult, because the umpire had sand thrown in his eyes. Getting to the truth was difficult. So for two years, he has been confronted by lies. Those lies are chronicled in the indictment, and they all weave the same pattern...with Libby saying that other reporters told him that Plame was CIA...and all the reporters saying the opposite...in some cases that Libby spoke to them about it. And in some of those cases he asked not to be identified as a senior whitehouse official. Orca