Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JakeStraw who wrote (258061)	11/2/2005 12:40:02 PM
From: bentway	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573850

Not really, but the Dems seem spineless on the war, with the exception of Russ Feingold and a couple of others. I'll vote for anyone who looks likely to pull us out. It may be a Republican, who knows. Once 80% of America has come around to being against the war, a politician would be stupid not to try to lead the parade. Bush really CAN'T. I'd be admitting the entire war was wrong, his "project". Iraq will define the Bush Presidency in history, just as Vietnam defined LBJ's. I'm sure they both thought the war would be long behind them by now, going in. He's got even LESS other accomplishments than LBJ! Do tax cuts make a legacy? Does being the deficit spendingest President in history endear? Unless a miracle happens in Iraq, the chimpistration is looking like a massive failure.