SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (710595)11/2/2005 3:11:45 PM
From: pompsander  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
White House and Republican leaders can't agree...if it looks like a "tax", why, it must be bad!


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Bush administration opposes a Republican proposal that oil companies voluntarily contribute some of their record profits to a federal fund that helps poor Americans pay winter heating bills, Energy Secretary Sam Bodman said on Wednesday.

ADVERTISEMENT

On Tuesday, Senate Finance Chairman Charles Grassley sent a letter to U.S. energy companies, urging them to donate 10 percent of their swelling profits to the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP).

Asked by reporters if the administration supported the plan, Bodman responded: "No, sir. I wouldn't support it. It is similar to a tax."

Bodman made his remarks after addressing an energy industry group.

Last year, the LIHEAP program spent $2.2 billion to help poor and elderly Americans pay their winter heating bills. Democrats say the fund should be doubled for this winter.

Bodman also said the White House was considering a variety of proposals to address high energy prices, including federal funding for LIHEAP, more offshore oil drilling, and creating a U.S. natural gas reserve that would be "analogous to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve," as well as a stockpile of refined products. Announcements on such initiatives would be ready in "weeks," he said.



To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (710595)11/2/2005 4:51:01 PM
From: BEEF JERKEY  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Its quite conceivable and likely that a neocon put Chalibi in touch with Miller.

Given the cozy nature between Miller and Libby and Chalibi, and Libby's strong push that there were WMD's it isn't a strech that Libby was also a source or scared up sources for Miller.

Your doing that defective reasoning thing again – using one fact to disprove a whole line of plausible reasoning.