SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (710623)11/2/2005 4:26:46 PM
From: trouthead  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
This is the date when they had hard copies, not the date they learned about their existence.

You seem to confuse Wilson's statement. He said they referenced a memorandum. He never says that he knew or that anyone else at that time knew they were forgeries.

It is only in the Wash. Post article, which is a third party account of what Wilson said, that there is any inference that Wilson saw and knew the docs were forgeries and that he based his conclusion of his trip on that fact. It is clearly in everything he has written something he learned later.

jb



To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (710623)11/2/2005 5:03:05 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
LOL!

They didn't bother trying to examine the document to ascertain it's authenticity... they just rolled with the faulty assumption from the Brits... who were repeating the same faulty report of the Italians... who themselves had been hornswaggled by a couple of notorous document forgers who had been trying to peddle their papers to the highest bidder. :)


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News