SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: steve harris who wrote (258144)11/2/2005 9:34:00 PM
From: paret  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574854
 
Maryland Democrats racist attack against Steele
'Party trumps race' for Steele foes
By S.A. Miller THE WASHINGTON TIMES November 2, 2005

Black Democratic leaders in Maryland say that racially tinged attacks against Lt. Gov. Michael S. Steele in his bid for the U.S. Senate are fair because he is a conservative Republican.
Such attacks against the first black man to win a statewide election in Maryland include pelting him with Oreo cookies during a campaign appearance, calling him an "Uncle Tom" and depicting him as a black-faced minstrel on a liberal Web log.
Operatives for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) also obtained a copy of his credit report -- the only Republican candidate so targeted.

But black Democrats say there is nothing wrong with "pointing out the obvious."
"There is a difference between pointing out the obvious and calling someone names," said a campaign spokesman for Kweisi Mfume, a Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate and former president of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.
State Sen. Lisa A. Gladden, a black Baltimore Democrat, said she does not expect her party to pull any punches, including racial jabs at Mr. Steele, in the race to replace retiring Democratic U.S. Sen. Paul S. Sarbanes.
"Party trumps race, especially on the national level," she said. "If you are bold enough to run, you have to take whatever the voters are going to give you. It's democracy, perhaps at its worse, but it is democracy."
Delegate Salima Siler Marriott, a black Baltimore Democrat, said Mr. Steele invites comparisons to a slave who loves his cruel master or a cookie that is black on the outside and white inside because his conservative political philosophy is, in her view, anti-black.
"Because he is a conservative, he is different than most public blacks, and he is different than most people in our community," she said. "His politics are not in the best interest of the masses of black people."
<V> During the 2002 campaign, Democratic supporters pelted Mr. Steele with Oreo cookies during a gubernatorial debate at Morgan State University in Baltimore.
In 2001, Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller Jr. called Mr. Steele an "Uncle Tom," when Mr. Steele headed the state Republican Party. Mr. Miller, Prince George's County Democrat, later apologized for the remark.
"That's not racial. If they call him the "N' word, that's racial," Mrs. Marriott said. "Just because he's black, everything bad you say about him isn't racial."
This week, the News Blog -- a liberal Web log run by Steve Gilliard, a black New Yorker -- removed a doctored photo of Mr. Steele that depicted him as a black-faced minstrel.
However, the blog has kept its headline "Simple Sambo wants to move to the big house." A caption beneath a photo of the lieutenant governor reads: "I's Simple Sambo and I's running for the Big House."
A spokesman for the Maryland Democratic Party denounced the depiction as being "extremely offensive" and having "no place in politics or in any other aspect of public discourse," The Washington Post reported. Democrats have denied any connection to the News Blog.
Still, Mfume spokesman Joseph P. Trippi said Mr. Steele opens himself to such criticism by defending Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. for holding a Republican fundraiser in July at the all-white Elkridge Club in Baltimore.
"The facts are the facts. Ehrlich went to that country club, and Steele said it didn't bother him," Mr. Trippi said. "I think that says something ... and should be part of this debate."
Several club members told the Baltimore Sun that, though blacks are welcome as guests and there is no policy banning blacks from membership, the club never has had a black member in its 127-year history.
Democrats also have used the club for various events, including Peter O'Malley, brother of and adviser to Baltimore Mayor Martin O'Malley, a Democratic candidate for governor. Peter O'Malley held his wedding reception there in 2003.
State Sen. Verna Jones, Baltimore Democrat and vice chairman of the General Assembly's legislative black caucus, said black Republicans deserve criticism because the Republican Party has not promoted the interests of the black community.
"The public policies supported by Democratic principles are the ones that most impact the African-American community," she said. "I'm not saying [Mr. Steele] is a sell-out. That's not for me to say."
In July, however, Mr. Mfume noted how Republicans were rallying for Mr. Steele but his party had ignored his historic candidacy. "More voters in Maryland are carrying the impression that the Democratic Party talks the talk, but doesn't always walk the walk. People may find a way to cross over in the fall," he said.
Steele campaign spokesman Leonardo Alcivar said state Democrats are afraid of losing the black vote to Mr. Steele.
"That has caused a great tremble throughout the Maryland Democratic Party," he said. "Of course [they are] going to condone racism. It's nothing new, and it's not surprising."



To: steve harris who wrote (258144)11/2/2005 9:38:28 PM
From: paret  Respond to of 1574854
 
WHY CLINTON BOMBED THE SERBS: An Analysis
Citizen Soldier ^ | November 2005 | Stella L. Jatras

Why Clinton Bombed the Serbs - A National Disgrace Few American Even Know Nor Care About

1. To appease the Islamic world for our daily bombing of Iraq. President Clinton wanted to prove to the Muslim world that we really cared and that we were willing to destroy a Christian people to prove it.

2. The Saudis wanted the first Islamic country in the belly of Europe, and Clinton wanted cheap oil and Saudi money. The Saudis had signed a letter of intent to buy $6 billion worth of Boeing aircraft. The day after we bombed the Serbs in 1995 based on the self-inflicted Markale market place massacre by Bosnian Muslim forces, the Saudis signed on the dotted line. A coincidence? I don't think so. This is what Yossef Bodansky, author of "Bin Laden: The Man Who Declared War on America," had to say in his 1995 book, "Offensive in the Balkans:"

- "Phase Three started with the self-inflicted major terrorist provocation. On Friday 5, 1994, a major explosion rocked the Markale -- Sarajevo's main market place -- causing heavy casualties. What was immediately described as the ubiquitous "Serb mortar shell" was actually a special charge designed and built with help from HizbAllah experts and then most likely dropped from a nearby rooftop onto the crowd of shoppers. Video cameras at the ready recorded this expertly-staged spectacle of gore, while dozens of corpses of Bosnian Muslim troops killed in action (exchanged the day before in a 'body swap' with the Serbs) were paraded in front of cameras to raise the casualty count.

- "This callous self-killing was designed to shock the West especially sentimental and gullible Washington, in order to raise the level of Western sympathy to the Bosnian Muslims and further demonize the Serbs so that Western governments would be more supportive of Sarajevo's forthcoming aggressive moves, and perhaps even finally intervene military."

There were other reports from European newspapers such as The [London] Sunday Times," with headlines that read, "Serbs 'not guilty' of massacre, Experts warned US that mortar was Bosnian" (1 Oct. 1995), and "US Framed Serbs for Market Bombing," from the Stoneyhill Center, a British think tank (Oct 1995). No such headlines appeared in US national newspapers.

3. Clinton needed a new mission for NATO. The Soviet Union had collapsed and if you recall, the NATO Treaty was a collective security agreement between member nations that if one NATO nation were attacked by the Soviet Union (CCCP), other NATO members would go to its defense. In violation of International law, the NATO Treaty, the UN Charter and without the approval of Congress, Clinton and his administration, along with Serb-hating Madeline Albright, Wesley Clark, Richard Holbrooke and the rest of the Clinton gang, bombed tiny Yugoslavia that did not attack us or any NATO nation, was never a threat to us, nor did it have weapons of mass destruction.

One graphic example of Madeleine Albright's animosity towards the Serbs was the time she was entering the United Nations building as US ambassador and a Serb called out and asked why she was doing these terrible things to the Serbs. She answered, "Because they deserve it!" A more humorous account regarding Ms. Albright is the story of how the war in the Balkans really began. During a meeting of Madeleine Albright with the all-male NATO ministers, she asked the question, "Well gentleman, do we make love or do we make war?" Of course, the answer was unanimously for war.

4. Clinton couldn't let this pip-squeak of a nation defy The New World Order.

5. Our wag-the-dog president had to have a diversion from his affair in the Oval Office with a woman young enough to be his daughter.

6. Clinton also needed a war to prove he was a wartime president in the mold of FDR in order to put to rest his draft-dodging days and his contempt for the US military. The propaganda against the Serbian people has not been equalled since Hitler's Minister of Propaganda, Joseph Goebbels, said, "If you tell a big enough lie and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it." In civil wars all sides do terrible things, but in this war all blame fell on the Serbs. President Clinton was (and continues to be) the biggest con artist this nation has ever seen and it is unfortunate that the American people believed every word uttered by him regarding the events in the Balkans even though over 75% of the American people believed him to be a liar. The fate of the Serbs from Bosnia to Kosovo was sealed.

It is a sad reflection on all Americans what William Jefferson Clinton did to the Serbian people in our name. Sadder still is the realization that if he were able to run for president again he might very well be elected.



To: steve harris who wrote (258144)11/2/2005 9:51:58 PM
From: paret  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574854
 
DEMOCRATS STICK FORK IN OWN HEADS
November 2, 2005

What a difference a week makes! Last week, liberals were expecting big things. They were counting on special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald and the White House to do their work for them.
On Friday, Fitzgerald was supposed to indict Karl Rove. Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld were going to be named unindicted co-conspirators. Maybe Condoleezza Rice too. Who knew — maybe even Clarence Thomas. There was even talk of a posthumous indictment for Nixon.
It was going to be Fitzmas Day! (Which is much like Christmas except instead of having her baby in a manger, the woman has a late-term abortion.) Oh, it was hard to fall asleep on Fitzmas Eve!
But Friday came, and only Irve Lewis Libby was accused of committing any crimes. They were all crimes like perjury and obstruction of justice, personal to Libby, unrelated to the administration.
Fitzmas sucked. Instead of GI Joe and Mr. Machine, all Democrats got was a lousy cardigan sweater.
With the Democrats still reeling from Friday's sad news, Bush gave them a right-hook by nominating the stunningly qualified Judge Sam Alito on Monday. (So I guess not all qualified candidates for the Supreme Court turned Bush down before he nominated Miers.)
Not only is Alito qualified, but he also does not consider membership in the Federalist Society comparable to joining the Klan. In other words, this was just the sort of judicial nominee that would have terrified the White House a month ago.
Judge Alito's dear 90-year-old mother — who evidently had not yet been briefed by White House political consultants to avoid stating positions popular with Americans — immediately said of her son, "Of course he's against abortion."
As a judge on the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, Alito voted to uphold a Pennsylvania statute passed by the legislature and signed into law by the governor that required women to notify their husbands before getting an abortion. (This was later deemed an "undue burden" by liberals' favorite Supreme Court justice, Sandra Day O'Connor.)
There is no question about Alito's qualifications. Democrats can only oppose him for his record, which will alarm a narrow segment of lunatics commonly known as "the Democratic Party base."
Now that timid Republicans are forced to face their fears, it turns out that liberal America was always a paper tiger. Americans are not rising in anger at a judicial nominee who would uphold a state law requiring husbands to be notified of their wives' abortions.
The only people attacking Alito for his abortion ruling are the usual nuts — Planned Parenthood, NARAL, People for the American Way and senators from New York and California (or what CBS thinks of as "the American heartland").
So confident are the Democrats about the popularity of their stance on abortion that the day after Alito's nomination, Senate Democrats shut down the Senate so they wouldn't be forced to talk about Alito.
Minority Leader Harry Reid dramatically invoked an obscure Senate rule to close the Senate for two hours, putatively in order to rehash old arguments about the Iraq war in closed session. In other words, Reid demanded more transparency in government by shutting the doors, throwing out the public, dimming the lights, and turning off the TV cameras in the chambers of the U.S. Senate.
That night, the cable news shows were fixated on Reid's weird stunt — and Senate Democrats narrowly avoided having to talk about Alito's abortion ruling for one more day.
If this is not a coincidence, let's see how long it takes Harry Reid to go on TV and state his position on a wife having to notify her husband before getting an abortion. Heck, I'd settle for seeing Harry Reid definitively adopt any position on legalized abortion.
The nuts are perplexed. Why aren't Senate Democrats screaming from rooftops: "This is a judge who would force women to tell their husbands before they have an abortion! Are you people listening?"
Maybe the Democrats aren't running from their base. Maybe they're trying to help NARAL by preventing anyone from finding out about their agenda. If only Democrats could get the American people to believe that a group with the words "abortion" and "rights" in its name is some kind of benevolent little charity that holds bake sales.
Believe me, you don't want the Democrats out there reminding the American people that it's a constitutional right to abort a baby five minutes before birth. I understand that People for the American Way thinks it is "the American way" for wives not to tell their husbands about an abortion. But that's because they need to get out more.
In a 2003 Gallup poll, 72 percent of respondents favored a law requiring the husband of a woman to be notified if she decides to have an abortion. To put it another way, only 28 percent of Americans hold the position that married men have absolutely no reproductive rights whatsoever (but a lot of responsibilities!).
Upward of 60 percent of self-described "liberals" and "Democrats" favored husbands being notified of their wives' abortions. This is consistent with polls going back a decade.
If these poll results don't sound right to you, try crossing Central Park sometime. You'll find another part of Manhattan that's not the Upper West Side. Or do something wild and visit Queens or Staten Island. You won't even have to leave New York City! See how normal people react to the idea of a woman being required to tell her husband that she's having an abortion.
In the past few years, the Democrats have had to run from big government, gun control, welfare, criminal rights and gay marriage. With the Alito nomination, it looks like the Democrats are going to have to renounce the NARAL ladies or prepare for another sad day after the 2006 elections.
COPYRIGHT 2005 ANN COULTER



To: steve harris who wrote (258144)11/2/2005 10:01:55 PM
From: paret  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574854
 
AIM Report: Yellow Press Promotes Red Rally - October B
October 19, 2005 Even the Washington Post's media reporter, Howard Kurtz, admitted after the fact the press did a "poor job" of describing the communists behind the demonstration. But it was worse than poor. It was deliberate deception.

Ms. Petula Dvorak's Washington Post story about the September 24 "anti-war" rally used a strategy that has been employed in the past by reporters anxious to avoid any mention of how communists run these events. She decided to focus on the dupes in the crowd. Dvorak reported, "The demonstration drew grandmothers in wheelchairs and babies in strollers, military veterans in fatigues and protest veterans in tie-dye."

AIM covered the event and posted photographs of some of the communist banners and signs on our website.

Even the Washington Post's media reporter, Howard Kurtz, admitted after the fact the press did a "poor job" of describing the communists behind the demonstration. But it was worse than poor. It was deliberate deception.

Imagine what the reaction of the media would be if it had been discovered that the Ku Klux Klan had played a key role in putting on a pro-war demonstration in the nation's capital. Do you think reporters would ignore that evidence? Or would they jump on it, doing stories and follow-up stories about how this came about, who was responsible, and whether it would ever happen again?

Deception

On the matter of who was actually in charge of the rally, a simple Google search could have uncovered information showing the connection between International ANSWER, the main march organizer, and the communist Workers World Party. The media deliberately ignored this information because there was an obvious effort to keep the American people in the dark about the nature of the "anti-war" movement.

By its own admission, ANSWER (Act Now to Stop War & End Racism) paid the full costs of the stage, sound and setup at the rally. The group's leaders, including Brian Becker, come out of the Workers World Party. This is a group so extreme in its adulation for anti-American dictators that honest liberals like David Corn of The Nation magazine have recoiled in dismay over how many people on the left associate with them.

The immediate aim is to defeat the U.S. in Iraq by creating the impression that the American people are tired of the war and want to withdraw U.S. troops.

Some would argue that it's a sign of America's strength that we permit communists to openly demonstrate on U.S. soil against American policies. But it's a sign of the weakness and corruption of our media that the key role being played by the communists is being carefully concealed from the American people.

A newspaper with an honest editorial page, Investor's Business Daily, declared that the role of the Workers World Party was an absolutely critical fact. The paper said, "ANSWER is a front group for the Stalinist Workers World Party. And any group that qualifies for that epithet in front of its name deserves special scrutiny, since Josef Stalin was responsible for the murder of as many as 25 million human beings."

We had wondered what the reaction of the press would have been if the KKK had organized a Washington rally. Investor's Business Daily brought up another scenario and said, "Imagine for a moment it was a different group that sponsored the demonstration—say, a neo-Nazi group. Think The Washington Post and other media would report that? You bet they would. After all, Adolf Hitler and his thugs were some of the worst mass murderers of all time. We would expect—no, demand—media to report that a demonstration attended by hundreds of middle class moms, concerned fathers and pacifist students was in fact organized by Brownshirts."

The paper asked, "So why do communists—particularly those who march under Stalin's flag—get different treatment? And why do thousands of average people feel comfortable marching arm in arm with them?"

Speaking of the Post, the paper never published a letter from John J. Tierney countering a Post "news" article about his views on the "anti-war" movement.

Censoring The Truth

The Post story by Dana Milbank and Alan Cooperman ridiculed Tierney, author of The Politics of Peace, for "seeing red" and allegedly telling a Heritage Foundation event that anti-war protester Cindy Sheehan was an "anti-American communist." Tierney told AIM that he never made such a charge. His book is published by the Capital Research Center.

His never-published letter said this:

"Your August 31 article 'Conservative Author Is Seeing Red in America' both simplifies and distorts my message about anti-American organizations attempting to co-opt the peace movement. I never accused Cindy Sheehan or any individual anti-war activist of being a 'communist.' My point was that several core groups masquerade as 'peace' activists but are, in fact, rooted in and driven by extreme, leftist ideologies, some including standard communistic socio/economic interpretations. My message to peace activists was a straightforward heads-up about the anti-American wolves who have donned doves' clothing."

So the Post lied about Tierney. And it refused to expose the wolves.

Anti-American Bent

Anybody who listened to Becker and many of the other speakers couldn't help but notice the rhetoric denouncing imperialism. This was Marxism openly on display.

Speakers depicted the U.S. and Israel as the main enemies. The heroes were Hugo Chavez, the anti-American ruler of Venezuela, and Cuban dictator Fidel Castro. But reporters for the liberal papers decided to ignore these speeches in order to emphasize so-called average folks who showed up. The Post, for example, focused on a Catholic Sister named Maureen Metty, attending her first-ever political rally.

Sister Metty should have been asked what the late Pope John Paul II would have thought about a Catholic nun participating in a pro-communist rally when he had played such a key role in bringing about the fall of Soviet-style communism.

The veil came off when one of the leaders of the WWP and ANSWER posted an article urging "solidarity" with the "Iraqi fighters" and "resistance" killing American troops and innocent civilians in Iraq. The article, "Iraqi resistance earns world's respect," was posted on the website of the Workers World Party (WWP) and is written by John Catalinotto, a WWP veteran who also represents International ANSWER, the WWP front organizing and sponsoring the protest.

The Catalinotto article stated that it is appropriate "that the U.S. anti-war movement, especially the serious opponents of imperialism, think of the Iraqi resistance as an important ally…The duty of the movement here is to join the struggle to make the continued U.S. occupation of Iraq impossible and to do this in solidarity with the Iraqi sisters and brothers who have stopped the empire in its tracks."

We were tipped off about the article by Herbert Romerstein, a former government investigator into communist strategy and tactics who produced a 1974 congressional study, "The Workers World Party and its Front Organizations," examining how the organization manipulated innocent people into supporting communist regimes and Arab terrorism. Romerstein said that the Catalinotto article reveals the real intentions of the protest organizers. "They've finally come out in the open," he said. "They've pretended to be for peace. But they're really a solidarity group for Al-Qaeda and the terrorists in Iraq. The Marxist-Leninists and the Islamic fundamentalists are now allied against the United States."

Another Dishonest Performance

The dishonesty of our media was also on display at the New York Times, which ran a story by Michael Janofsky referring to the main sponsor of the rally, the ANSWER Coalition, as representing "a wide range of progressive political objectives…" This is comparable to saying that V.I. Lenin was a liberal activist.

In fact, AIM editor Cliff Kincaid picked up a copy of the "selected writings" of Lenin on "National Liberation, Socialism and Imperialism" at the rally. It was available at the literature table of the Workers World Party.

Feeding The Press

AIM editor Kincaid also attended a news conference in Washington on September 1 that outlined the plans for the September 24 protest. He witnessed how the radical operatives carefully attended to the needs of the press, offering special access, interviews and information.

Reporters for major media, including the Post and Times, were singled out on a first-name basis.

One target was Elizabeth White, a writer for Associated Press, a national news service. She produced exactly what the ANSWER crowd wanted. Her story, which circulated nationally and was so sympathetic to the protest that it was distributed by ANSWER to its own email list, did not contain any hint that there was anything controversial about the rally or its organizers.

This is how the communists manipulate our press. That it happens time after time demonstrates the problem we face as a nation as we struggle with a menace, fanatical Islam, more insidious than the international communist movement.



To: steve harris who wrote (258144)11/2/2005 11:42:46 PM
From: paret  Respond to of 1574854
 
Six Nights Of Riots In Paris Ghetto Split Chirac Cabinet
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 11-3-2005 | Henry Samuel

The French government was reeling yesterday after six nights of rioting which have exposed a split in the cabinet over how to deal with poverty and immigration in the dilapidated Paris suburbs.

As authorities cleaned up the debris of another bout of violence, including the wrecks of 250 cars burned out on Tuesday night, both the prime minister, Dominique de Villepin, and the interior minister, Nicolas Sarkozy, put off foreign trips to deal with the rioting.

Youths on the Paris estates have promised ‘40 nights of violence’

"We sure showed it to them last night," said one youth in Clichy-sous-Bois, a grim suburb of high-rises some 15 miles outside Paris.

The worsening crisis jolted President Jacques Chirac out of a six-day silence into calling for calm and a firm hand in dealing with a "dangerous situation".

"The law must be applied firmly and in a spirit of dialogue and respect," the president said at a cabinet meeting.

Using words which could be seen as critical of the tough policing tactics promoted by Mr Sarkozy: "The absence of dialogue and an escalation of a lack of respect will lead to a dangerous situation."

The riots first broke out on the Chêne-Pointu council estate. Last Thursday, two adolescents from the estate died when they scaled the 8ft wall of an electricity substation to dodge police and were electrocuted.

A third escaped with severe burns. The two dead youths, Ziad and Banou, have become symbols of the social problems that ring the capital.

"They were good kids coming back from a football game. Their criminal record was almost completely clean," said Kolan, a black 22-year-old who was part of a foursome, all of North African origin, scuffing their feet in the estate entrance.

The police say they were not chasing the youths who died, but another nearby group.

"We have witnesses who saw them being chased by two policemen. They had done nothing, but if the police chase you around here, you run, guilty or not, because you can be sure they won't be kind with you," said Kolan.

Chêne-Pointu typifies the problems of many of the urban ghettoes that surround Paris and other large French cities: a high immigrant population, soaring unemployment and drug dealing.

Many of the youths blame Mr Sarkozy for the continued violence, with what they consider to be highly provocative language. He has pledged to "industrially clean" council estates and to rid them of "scum".

On Sunday night, he promised "zero tolerance" of suburban crime. Two rioters have already received three-month jail sentences and a dozen more face charges.

"We're not dumb. Sarkozy has declared war on suburban youth," said Karim, 23. "Unless he apologises for the way he has treated us, then he can expect 40 nights of violence," he said.

But others around the estate back Mr Sarkozy. "What he says may be crude, but he's right. Drug runners and petty criminals have had it good too long around here.

"There's only so much social prevention you can do, then you have to repress," said Marie-Jeanne Sacré, a social worker.

In the neighbouring Bosquet estate, Traore Gounedi, a 27-year-old worker in a local social centre, is incensed. "Ten years ago, Clichy was a real no-go area. But in recent years we had built up sports clubs and other associations and it had become calm.

"The way Sarkozy has dealt with this, using riot police and terms the National Front would be proud of, has put the clock back 10 years. Once Ramadan ends on Friday, things will get worse."

As night fell at Chêne-Pointu, sirens heralded the approach of two fire engines that positioned themselves in front of the estate awaiting the flames.



To: steve harris who wrote (258144)11/2/2005 11:48:19 PM
From: paret  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574854
 
I wonder what shameless tactic Dirty Chirac will use to throw Sarkozy under the bus.

Like the American Dems who adore Chirac, sacrificing national security for political gain is only natural.



To: steve harris who wrote (258144)11/3/2005 3:30:29 AM
From: paret  Respond to of 1574854
 
A Civil War Underway in Old Europe

Ramadan Rioting in Europe's No-Go Areas
From the desk of Paul Belien on Wed, 2005-11-02

brusselsjournal.com

This is from Sweden:

“‘If we park our car it will be damaged – so we have to go very often in two vehicles, one just to protect the other vehicle,’ said Rolf Landgren, a Malmo police officer. Fear of violence has changed the way police, firemen and emergency workers do their jobs. There are some neighborhoods Swedish ambulance drivers will not go to without a police escort. Angry crowds have threatened them, telling them which patient to take and which ones to leave behind.”

This is from France:

“Sarkozy says that violence in French suburbs is a daily fact of life. Since the start of the year, 9,000 police cars have been stoned and, each night, 20 to 40 cars are torched.”



This is from Brussels:

“The police has been told [by the Mayor] that it is ‘not expedient’ to patrol [in the Brussels suburb of Molenbeek] and officers are not allowed to drink coffee or eat a sandwich in the street during ramadan.”



This is from Denmark (and it is hot news relating to the Muhammad cartoons):

“For several nights in a row Rosenhøj Mall has been the scene of the worst riots in Århus for years. ‘This area belongs to us’, the youths proclaimed. [...] ‘The police have to stay away. This is our area. We decide what goes on down here’. [...] Falck, a Danish private emergency service, sent a group of fire engines under police escort to the Kjærslund nursery on Søndervangs Allé, right across the street from Rosenhøj Mall. A window had been shattered at the back of the house, and the fire had been blazing, apparently caused by gasoline poured onto the floor and lit. Falck stopped on Viby Square, a couple of kilometers from the site of the arson attack, waiting for the police to turn up so they could be escorted to the nursery.”

The Nightmare of Permanent Conflict

If you want to know what is the matter with those that are described by the mainstream media as rioting “youths,” read Theodore Dalrymple’s poignant analysis in the latest issue of City Journal. We are just witnessing the beginning of Europe’s problems: “The sweet dream of universal cultural compatibility has been replaced by the nightmare of permanent conflict.”

Our mainstream media, in attempts to preserve the Left’s chimera of “universal cultural compatibility,” hardly write about all this. Nevertheless, for some years now West European city folk and police officers have been familiar with the reality that certain areas of major European cities are no-go areas, especially at night and certainly if you are white or wearing a uniform. Three years ago, a French friend who had his car stolen learned that the thieves had parked the car in a particular suburb. When he went to the police he was told that the police did not operate in that neighbourhood and consequently would not be able to retrieve his car. This is Western Europe in the early 21st century.

Nicolas Sarkozy became France’s most popular politician by promising to restore law and order in the whole of France, including in the areas abandoned by previous governments. Since Sarkozy became Interior Minister he has insisted on more police presence in Muslim neighbourhoods. This triggered last week’s riots in the Paris suburb of Clichy-sous-Bois, when policemen went in to investigate a robbery and two teenagers stupidly got themselves electrocuted while hiding from the police in an electricity sub station. Many French politicians now probably regret that the police had the audacity to investigate a robbery in Clichy. The result of the incident so far has been six consecutive nights of rioting that is now engulfing the entire Paris suburban area and might soon affect other parts of the country. Last night at least 69 vehicles were torched in nine suburbs across the Paris region. Officials say that small, mobile gangs are harassing police, sometimes even shooting at them. The gangs are setting vehicles, police stations and schools on fire throughout the region.

Though the world is taking no notice, the same is currently happening in certain parts of Denmark.

Bring in the Army

Sarkozy has referred to those whom the media call “troublesome youths” as scum and rabble. “I speak with real words,” the minister says. “When you fire real bullets at police, you’re not a ‘youth,’ you’re a thug.” Unfortunately, it looks as if Clichy-sous-Bois might become Nicolas Sarkozy’s Waterloo because he seems to be losing the support of his colleagues in the government. Moreover, Sarkozy does not even seem to have the means necessary to fight the “youths.”

The riots in France have been going on for a week now. During the second night of street fighting in Clichy, police officers already warned that they are not up to the task Sarkozy has set them. “There’s a civil war underway,” one officer declared. “We can no longer withstand this situation on our own. My colleagues neither have the equipment nor the practical or theoretical training for street fighting.” If there is, indeed, a war going on, Sarkozy cannot win it with troops that are mere policemen and fire fighters. As Irwin Stelzer pointed out last July when discussing the British reaction to the London bombings: In a war, use the army, rather than police. The latter, however, is unlikely to happen. If the politicians bring in the army they are acknowledging what the policemen, the fire fighters and the ambulance drivers know but what the political and media establishment wants to hide from the people: that there is civil war brewing and that Europe is in for a long period of armed conflict. This is the last thing appeasing politicians want to do and so they have begun to criticise Sarkozy.

The appeasers are found not only in the opposition parties but also within Sarkozy’s own party, where Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin, who envies him his popularity, is eager to bring his rival down. Apart from political intra-party rivalry, however, there are two reasons why most politicians seem to be of the appeasing kind.

The first one is that the Muslim population in Western Europe has become so large that politicians fear what it might be capable of. Commenting on the situation in Britain, Theodore Dalrymple wrote in City Journal: “Surveys suggest that between 6 and 13 percent of British Muslims – that is, between 98,000 and 208,000 people – are sympathetic toward Islamic terrorists and their efforts. Theoretical sympathy expressed in a survey is not the same thing as active support or a wish to emulate the ‘martyrs’ in person, of course. But it is nevertheless a sufficient proportion and absolute number of sympathizers to make suspicion and hostility toward Muslims by the rest of society not entirely irrational, though such suspicion and hostility could easily increase support for extremism. This is the tightrope that the British state and population will now have to walk for the foreseeable future.” It applies to all West European nations. Where, however, is the boundary between carefully walking the tightrope and falling victim to the Stockholm syndrome? The latter would mean that Western politicians act as hostages of the Muslim extremists.

A second reason why some politicians try to appease the Muslims is that these are now a substantial segment of the voting population. Demographics are deciding the fate of Europe’s democracy. Time is running out. If Sarkozy cannot win the battle today, it is unlikely that he or anyone else will be able to do so tomorrow. If Clichy turns out to be Sarkozy’s Waterloo, it will be a catastrophe not just for France.



To: steve harris who wrote (258144)11/3/2005 9:47:07 AM
From: paret  Respond to of 1574854
 
Residents say beating fits widespread pattern
Philadelphia Inquirer ^ | Nov. 03, 2005 | By Robert Moran, Gaiutra Bahadur and Susan Snyder

The vicious beating of a 13-year-old Liberian boy in Southwest this week has exposed a larger problem of animosity between African Americans and African immigrants, according to community members and school officials.

Police reported no arrests yesterday in the beating of Jacob Gray and were reluctant to label the incident a hate crime, but members of a Liberian community that has grown along Woodland Avenue say the attack fits a widespread pattern.

"It's been going on for a quite a while," said Sekou Kamara, 25, a Liberian immigrant and Temple University student who runs a music and video store. "It's just the first time we've seen it in the newspapers."

Kamara said his 18-year-old brother, who attends high school in Delaware County, was beaten this year by other blacks, and his sister had braids ripped from her head in an attack in Atlantic City.

Kamara said some African Americans perceive the growing African-born community as a threat.

"That's what the fighting is really about," he said. "You have this increasing African community competing with African American kids."

Gray, a recent refugee from Liberia, was knocked unconscious Monday afternoon at 60th Street and Woodland Avenue by a group of black youths as he walked home from nearby Tilden Middle School, police said. The eighth grader remained at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia last night, but had been moved out of intensive care and into a regular ward, family members said.

He has been able to speak to detectives. He told them he does not know why he was attacked.

Orabella Richards, a Liberian businesswoman who instructs African American health-care workers on how to deal with African immigrants, said there is often friction between the two groups.

"There's anger about African immigrants coming here and doing so well," she said. "You see them fixing up their houses, buying cars."

Dixon Koffa Daye, 40, who opened a restaurant on Woodland recently, said he sometimes senses the resentment. "We came here to seek refuge," he said. "Us being here, some people take it as an insult."

The tensions escalate when children become involved, Richards said.

Moses Barquoi, 54, owner of Mosel International Market on Woodland, said that "American kids have a way of bullying kids from Africa for their accent."

"The worst of all is if you're good in class," said Varney Kanneh, 47, a host on WSKR-FM (97.7) from Liberia, who alleged that some of his children had been harassed and attacked in Philadelphia public schools.

The immigrants make some of the African American students look bad, Kanneh said, "and they don't want to look bad."

In response to the harassment and attacks, African immigrant youths are seeking protection by assembling and traveling in groups, Kanneh said.

Officer Joseph Young, the community relations officer for the 12th Police District, said he was aware of isolated incidents but no widespread problem.

Capt. Michael Sinclair, commander of the Southwest Detective Division, concurred.

There may be name-calling and similar incidents, but police are contacted only when the matter rises to a criminal offense, as in the Gray beating, Sinclair said.

In response to fears of being attacked, some African teenagers have formed gangs, said Portia Kamara, a Liberian-born director of Multicultural Family Services, an Upper Darby nonprofit agency.

"The kids talk about being called African chimps, African monkeys, sometimes being told to go back to Africa," she said.

Kamara recalled one youth telling her: "We are not forming gangs to go out and rob people, but it is a way of protecting ourselves against African Americans who think they can hurt us."

At Tilden Middle School, principal Michelle Burns said she is planning to offer sessions for the community on West African issues to "start bringing the two cultures together" and ease tensions.

The school, where 90 percent of the students are black, and 20 percent of the total student body is from West Africa, also will continue its work with local community agencies, including Project Tamaa, which runs support groups for West African students at Tilden. Educators also will try to recruit West African parents to help out in the school, she said.

Another way for African youths to deal with the hostility and cultural differences is to assimilate, and that creates more tension between African Americans and African immigrants, because the immigrant parents feel they are in a struggle with black America for the souls of their children.

"African parents feel their children are being influenced," Richards said. "The kids assimilate. They try and imitate [African American] children in their manner, their dress. They're hanging out in the neighborhood. And their parents don't want that."

Many families have pulled their children out of the Philadelphia school system as a result of the animosity, said Sam Slewion, a city social worker and a leader of the Liberian Association of Pennsylvania.

He hears complaints about fights and near-fights between native-born and immigrant blacks several times a week. A few have led to Family Court, Municipal Court, and the Philadelphia Human Relations Commission, he said.

Two years ago, Cyprian Anyanwu, founder of the Philadelphia-based African Congress USA, and others applied to open a charter school in Southwest Philadelphia aimed at improving strained relations by integrating immigrant children and city students. His application was turned down.

Anyanwu submitted a revised proposal last month. The district is expected to hold hearings on charter proposals in two weeks.

Patrick Doggett, Jacob Gray's math and science teacher, said that classmates did tease Gray early on about the darkness of his skin and his accent, but that those comments were lessening. However, comments such as "Go back to Africa" still surface in his class, he said.

"I have four or five other immigrant students in my class as well. We seem to have to stop every day to address the issue of respect, for gender, races, ethnicities," he said.

Jerolyn Brown, Gray's sister, said he had only been attending classes for two weeks. He had no friends yet and no enemies either, she said.

After Gray recovers, he will be transferred to another school, said Burns, the principal. Members of the community have been calling to offer donations to Gray's family, and the school is establishing a fund, she said.

Patricia Doe, an American-history teacher who is married to a native of Liberia, said she is appalled at the prejudice in the community.

"They didn't come here to take anything away from anybody or to displace anybody else," said Doe, whose husband is a choreographer and drummer. "They came because they had a right to come to find a better life."

Residents say beating fits widespread pattern
Inquirer ^ | Posted on Thu, Nov. 03, 2005 | By Robert Moran, Gaiutra Bahadur and Susan Snyder

Posted on 11/03/2005 9:26:18 AM EST by jasoncann

The vicious beating of a 13-year-old Liberian boy in Southwest Philadelphia this week has exposed a larger problem of animosity between African Americans and African immigrants, according to community members and school officials.

Police reported no arrests yesterday in the beating of Jacob Gray and were reluctant to label the incident a hate crime, but members of a Liberian community that has grown along Woodland Avenue say the attack fits a widespread pattern.

"It's been going on for a quite a while," said Sekou Kamara, 25, a Liberian immigrant and Temple University student who runs a music and video store. "It's just the first time we've seen it in the newspapers."

Kamara said his 18-year-old brother, who attends high school in Delaware County, was beaten this year by other blacks, and his sister had braids ripped from her head in an attack in Atlantic City.

Kamara said some African Americans perceive the growing African-born community as a threat.

"That's what the fighting is really about," he said. "You have this increasing African community competing with African American kids."

Gray, a recent refugee from Liberia, was knocked unconscious Monday afternoon at 60th Street and Woodland Avenue by a group of black youths as he walked home from nearby Tilden Middle School, police said. The eighth grader remained at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia last night, but had been moved out of intensive care and into a regular ward, family members said.

He has been able to speak to detectives. He told them he does not know why he was attacked.

Orabella Richards, a Liberian businesswoman who instructs African American health-care workers on how to deal with African immigrants, said there is often friction between the two groups.

"There's anger about African immigrants coming here and doing so well," she said. "You see them fixing up their houses, buying cars."

Dixon Koffa Daye, 40, who opened a restaurant on Woodland recently, said he sometimes senses the resentment. "We came here to seek refuge," he said. "Us being here, some people take it as an insult."

The tensions escalate when children become involved, Richards said.

Moses Barquoi, 54, owner of Mosel International Market on Woodland, said that "American kids have a way of bullying kids from Africa for their accent."

"The worst of all is if you're good in class," said Varney Kanneh, 47, a host on WSKR-FM (97.7) from Liberia, who alleged that some of his children had been harassed and attacked in Philadelphia public schools.

The immigrants make some of the African American students look bad, Kanneh said, "and they don't want to look bad."

In response to the harassment and attacks, African immigrant youths are seeking protection by assembling and traveling in groups, Kanneh said.

Officer Joseph Young, the community relations officer for the 12th Police District, said he was aware of isolated incidents but no widespread problem.

Capt. Michael Sinclair, commander of the Southwest Detective Division, concurred.

There may be name-calling and similar incidents, but police are contacted only when the matter rises to a criminal offense, as in the Gray beating, Sinclair said.

In response to fears of being attacked, some African teenagers have formed gangs, said Portia Kamara, a Liberian-born director of Multicultural Family Services, an Upper Darby nonprofit agency.

"The kids talk about being called African chimps, African monkeys, sometimes being told to go back to Africa," she said.

Kamara recalled one youth telling her: "We are not forming gangs to go out and rob people, but it is a way of protecting ourselves against African Americans who think they can hurt us."

At Tilden Middle School, principal Michelle Burns said she is planning to offer sessions for the community on West African issues to "start bringing the two cultures together" and ease tensions.

The school, where 90 percent of the students are black, and 20 percent of the total student body is from West Africa, also will continue its work with local community agencies, including Project Tamaa, which runs support groups for West African students at Tilden. Educators also will try to recruit West African parents to help out in the school, she said.

Another way for African youths to deal with the hostility and cultural differences is to assimilate, and that creates more tension between African Americans and African immigrants, because the immigrant parents feel they are in a struggle with black America for the souls of their children.

"African parents feel their children are being influenced," Richards said. "The kids assimilate. They try and imitate [African American] children in their manner, their dress. They're hanging out in the neighborhood. And their parents don't want that."

Many families have pulled their children out of the Philadelphia school system as a result of the animosity, said Sam Slewion, a city social worker and a leader of the Liberian Association of Pennsylvania.

He hears complaints about fights and near-fights between native-born and immigrant blacks several times a week. A few have led to Family Court, Municipal Court, and the Philadelphia Human Relations Commission, he said.

Two years ago, Cyprian Anyanwu, founder of the Philadelphia-based African Congress USA, and others applied to open a charter school in Southwest Philadelphia aimed at improving strained relations by integrating immigrant children and city students. His application was turned down.

Anyanwu submitted a revised proposal last month. The district is expected to hold hearings on charter proposals in two weeks.

Patrick Doggett, Jacob Gray's math and science teacher, said that classmates did tease Gray early on about the darkness of his skin and his accent, but that those comments were lessening. However, comments such as "Go back to Africa" still surface in his class, he said.

"I have four or five other immigrant students in my class as well. We seem to have to stop every day to address the issue of respect, for gender, races, ethnicities," he said.

Jerolyn Brown, Gray's sister, said he had only been attending classes for two weeks. He had no friends yet and no enemies either, she said.

After Gray recovers, he will be transferred to another school, said Burns, the principal. Members of the community have been calling to offer donations to Gray's family, and the school is establishing a fund, she said.

Patricia Doe, an American-history teacher who is married to a native of Liberia, said she is appalled at the prejudice in the community.

"They didn't come here to take anything away from anybody or to displace anybody else," said Doe, whose husband is a choreographer and drummer. "They came because they had a right to come to find a better life."




To: steve harris who wrote (258144)11/3/2005 10:21:31 AM
From: paret  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574854
 
Do all the lefties here know that yesterday was the first anniversary of George W Bush's re-election ?