SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Taro who wrote (258239)11/3/2005 12:53:40 PM
From: bentway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572778
 
What don't you understand?

Scott McClellan questioned him.

He told Scott he had nothing to do with it.

Scott told us that Rove had told him he had nothing to do with it.

That was a lie. I didn't SAY he committed perjury to the grand jury. I said he lied to Scott McClellan, who lied to US. If you can't see this, you're in denial. either Scott McClellan lied, or Rove lied. If Scott lied, why didn't Rove correct the record?

------------------------------

"Many mid-level staffers inside have expressed frustration that press secretary Scott McClellan's credibility was undermined by Rove, who told the spokesman that he was not involved in the leak, according to people familiar with the case.

Some aides said Rove told Bush the same thing, though little is known about the precise nature of the president's conversations with his closest political adviser.

McClellan relayed Rove's denial to reporters from the White House lectern in 2003, and he has not yet offered a public explanation for his inaccurate statements. "That is affecting everybody," said a Republican who has discussed the issue with the White House. "Scott personally is really beaten down by this. Everybody I talked to talks about this."