Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Geoff Altman who wrote (2088)	11/4/2005 12:58:33 AM
From: bentway	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

Scott McClellan told us he'd asked Rove, and Rove had nothing to do with the Plame affair. Scott told us it was "ridiculous" to think Rove was "involved". Rove told Fitzgerald he HAD something to do with the Plame affair, and WAS involved, otherwise he'd have had to perjure himself and be in the same boat as Libby. Did Rove lie to us through Scott McClellan? Did he lie to the chimp? The chimp claimed he questioned the staff, and they denied having anything to do with it. Did Libby lie to the chimp? Did CHENEY lie to the chimp? Or, is the chimp just lying too? So, it seems Rove lied. He may not have perjured himself by lying under oath, but he lied to US through Scott McClellan, just as baldly as Clinton did, but about something far more serious. Do we want a proven, known liar in the White House? Either Scott McClellan lied, or Rove lied Scott had NO motive. It looks to me like the chimpistration are a bunch of lyin' mofos!