Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (145717)	11/4/2005 6:30:27 AM
From: John Carragher	Respond to of 793838

Planned Parenthood v. Casey on the constitutionality of Pennsylvania's spousal notification . casey's son is running for senator against rick San.

To: LindyBill who wrote (145717)	11/4/2005 9:19:56 AM
From: Lane3	Respond to of 793838

>>Requiring a married woman to sign a form saying that she notified her husband.<< I haven't been following this closely but I had gotten the impression somewhere that the husband had to certify that he had been notified. I don't know if Alito opponents were intentionally overstating the burden or if this particular notification was accidentally confused with other more onerous notifications. I can see taking exception to Alito if the husband's certification were required. The wife's certification is vastly less burdensome.