Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ChinuSFO who wrote (69529)	11/7/2005 11:12:58 AM
From: tonto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

Awwww, you are still upset that I outed you as a dumb liar that made up a life which was untrue. You did look stupid being caught. Who is juvenile? LOLOL

To: ChinuSFO who wrote (69529)	11/7/2005 5:06:11 PM
From: lorne	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

chinu. So how about those so called " moderate molsums " burning, killing, looting France....the very country that supported them so much. Sort of like the thanks America got for going to war to defend moslums in Bosnia and their thanks to America .... 9/11 I can hardly wait to see how your blind hate will blame Bush for this as well. You remember I told you Europe is in bad trouble with their non assimilated islam populations? What do you think should be done.....appease them more...give them money? give them political power and really destroy France or any other European country for that matter. What a mess.

To: ChinuSFO who wrote (69529)	11/8/2005 1:55:06 AM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 81568

"There were no terrorists in Iraq before the US went into Iraq." So, have you come up with evidence that the fellow behind the '92 WTC bombing didn't live in Iraq for years? Tip of the iceberg, IMHO, as Iraq flat out supported terrorism and Saddam was one himself by definition. Not only haven't you proved the "point" that Saddam was a local bully only, but in fact the testimony and evidence that Saudis trained on a fuselage in Iraq remains highly viable. Just the tip of the iceberg, no doubt in my mind. When you write obviously false statements and contradict yourself in the very same post, then fail to discuss let alone admit the apparent idiocy of your prior statements, I'm indeed compelled to tell you to grow up, and do so again. Today (monday) I've seen the old clips of Hillary Clinton stating that Saddam supported Al Qaeda. Did she lie for Bush? Was she duped by Bush, or just the same evidence Bush had? WAS she even duped or wrong at all, indeed? Did she cherry pick evidence? Even cherry picked evidence may be quite true. Not only don't you know she was wrong, but calling her a liar over this is as false as calling Bush one over any of your points like this. Dan B.