Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Anchan who wrote (1693)	11/8/2005 7:53:24 PM
From: Proud Deplorable	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78418

What? Why do you think this is going to be big? READ the NR carefully "The 5 cm wide by 7 cm deep channel samples were collected across the exposed outcrop surface using a portable diamond-blade saw. The nine 0.2 to 0.5 m long channel samples collected returned assays from .." There should be a law against putting out this kind of crap.

To: Anchan who wrote (1693)	11/10/2005 12:08:04 PM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 78418

The expansion potential of this vein/vms system seems palpable. In some ways the previous drilling seems do discount it, but the multiple showings over 2 miles in length may point to a 'medium' tonnage system lurking at depth. I would not go out and dilute their interest with a JV partner just yet if they can get together any sort of cash for deeper, more focused drilling. We need a better overall picture of the potential and a model that drilling can aim at, but I have an inkling there may be some sort of viable model may come out of further investigation. EC<:-}