Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (174583)	11/8/2005 7:04:36 PM
From: Proud Deplorable	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I thought Bush and friends were responsible for, or at least complicit, in the 9/11 attacks. That's what they are saying all around the world. Have you missed something? He did it to rally people behind his plans to atack Iraq illegally, no?.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (174583)	11/9/2005 2:49:37 AM
From: geode00	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

You don't know what we've prevented and whether we've prevented more or less than we did before 911. What's obvious is that the same people who didn't or couldn't or wouldn't prevent 911 are still running around the White House even after they compromised national security. What is abundantly clear is that the US, in the person of contractors and military, are being pummeled every single day by attacks. That never happened before. This is all Bush's doing. Bush, when he can't get an actual attack to fix his sagging poll numbers, does resort to fake 4 year old scares or simply raises the tropicana alert level. 911 is the best thing that ever happened to Bush's political career and he managed to fold, spindle and mutilate it into the mess in Iraq.