SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush Administration's Media Manipulation--MediaGate? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Peter Dierks who wrote (5495)11/9/2005 9:29:09 AM
From: Proud_Infidel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9838
 
France just surrendered......

France - French government announces measures to appease rioters
Le Monde via Babelfish ^ | November 8, 2005

lemonde.fr@2-706693,36-708056@51-704172,0.html

Voici principal measurements, in particular employment education, announced or confirmed by the Prime Minister, Domenica de Villepin, at the time of its intervention at the French National Assembly, Tuesday November 8:
EMPLOYMENT

- All the young people of less than 25 years, applicants for work or not, living one of the 750 significant zones, will be received in the three next months for a "maintenance deepened" by the ANPE, in the local missions or the Houses of employment. A "specific solution" will be proposed to them in the three months (formation, training course or contract).

- the social recipients of minimas will be incited to find an employment by the creation of a premium of 1 000 euros and of a monthly contractual premium of 150 euros for 12 months.

- 20 000 contracts of accompaniment for employment and Contrats with a future reserved for the underprivileged districts will be created to develop uses of proximity.

- 15 new urban free zones will be founded, in addition to 85 what exists.

- the number of "adult-relay" ensuring the bond between the public families and institutions will be doubled.

HOUSING

The means of the Agency of urban restoration will be increased by 25 % over two years.

EDUCATION

- Creation of 5 000 stations of teaching assistants in the 1200 colleges of the sensitive districts.

- Doubly of the number of teams of educational success envisaged by the plan of social cohesion (1 000 at the end of 2007).

- Possibility of entry in training as of 14 years, instead of 16 currently.

- 100 000 purses with the merit will be granted to the re-entry 2006, against 30 000 currently.

- Opening of ten boarding schools of educational success additional, "for the most justified most promising pupils and" .

HEALTH

- Development of the workshops health-city to put in network the actors of health.

- Amplification of the device of the psychosocial mobile teams.

INTEGRATION

- Creation of an agency of social cohesion and equal opportunity which will be "the interlocutor of the mayors" .

- Creation of prefects delegated to the equal opportunity.

ASSOCIATIONS

100 additional million euros will be allocated into 2006 to the 14 000 associations subsidized by the State.

SAFETY

The ministry for the interior will recruit 2000 additional agents for the disadvantaged districts, within the framework of the device of the contracts of access to employment, as from January 2006.



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (5495)11/9/2005 12:31:26 PM
From: Skywatcher  Respond to of 9838
 
the curtain is coming down on the FRICK and FRACK let's go to war twins
Blair loses key terror bill vote

Wednesday, November 9, 2005; Posted: 12:06 p.m. EST (17:06 GMT)

story.blair.presser.jpg
Blair insists police have made a strong case to hold terror suspects for longer.
Save on All Your Calls with Vonage
When looking for local regional and long distance calling, use Vonage to make...
www.vonage.com
$160,000 Mortgage for $633/mo
Refinance rates are at record lows. Compare rates - free service.
www.lowermybills.com
Comcast High-Speed Internet
Order today for a $19.99/mo. special, free modem, plus get $75 cash back when...
www.comcastoffers.com
More Useful Links
• Get a New Car Cheap
• Notebook Computers
• Online Shopping

WATCH
Browse/Search
Blair faces a critical vote over terror laws (2:33)
QUICKVOTE
How long should terror suspects be detained without charge?
14 days
28 days
90 days
No limit
or View Results
SPECIAL REPORT
• Security Watch
• Gallery: Hunt for al Qaeda
• Timeline: Al Qaeda attacks
• Explainer: Terror alert system
• Special Report
YOUR E-MAIL ALERTS
Tony Blair
Great Britain
Terrorism
or Create Your Own
Manage Alerts | What Is This?

LONDON, England (AP) -- British Prime Minister Tony Blair has lost a crucial parliamentary vote on sweeping anti-terror legislation Wednesday, the first major defeat of his premiership and a serious blow to his authority.

Lawmakers blocked plans to detain terror suspects for 90 days without charge by 322 votes to 291.

Opposition to the 90-day plan was intense and many of Blair's own Labour Party lawmakers rebelled. Defeat was a humiliating blow to the prime minister, and raises serious questions about his grip on power.

Knowing the vote would be tight, Blair recalled two Cabinet ministers from overseas trips to shore up numbers. Treasury chief Gordon Brown flew back from Israel just two hours after arriving, while Foreign Secretary Jack Straw will cut short an official European Union visit to Russia.

The Terrorism Bill was drafted in the wake of the July 7 suicide bombings on London's transit system that killed 52 commuters and the four suspected bombers, and the failed attacks two weeks later.

Designed to tackle Muslim extremism, the bill aimed to outlaw training in terrorist camps, encouraging acts of violence and glorifying terrorism.

Many lawmakers were concerned the glorification clause could criminalize people supporting independence movements around the world and are seeking amendments to the bill.

But the most controversial proposal was to extend the time terror suspects can be held without charge. Police and prosecutors argue more time is needed in complex cases in which suspects often have multiple aliases and store information in tightly encrypted computers, and in which cooperation of foreign agencies is needed.

Critics claimed holding people for three months without charge would erode civil rights, and are demanding that the current maximum 14-day period be extended to 28 days rather than 90.

The government had offered some concessions, ensuring that a senior High Court judge must review the detention every seven days. Home Secretary Charles Clarke has also added a so-called "sunset clause" -- so that the measure will expire in a year unless approved again by Parliament.

But Blair, who is fighting to shore up his authority, refused to budge on the length of time. He has made the issue political, suggesting Labour can paint the opposition Conservatives -- long regarded as the natural champions of law and order -- as soft on terrorism.

His resolve was stiffened by the belief that a majority of Britons supported the measure.

Copyright 2005 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (5495)11/9/2005 1:31:25 PM
From: Skywatcher  Respond to of 9838
 
The PUBLICANHYPOCRITACRACY at full bore here....
after IGNORING THE PLAME DISASTEROUS LEAK that endangered our entire ANTI WMD program and most likely led to many agents and their contacts being both RUINED OR KILLED>....
something they HELD UP FOR 2 FRIGGEN YEARS....
they jump on this....an IMPORTANT LEAK FOR DEMOCRACY...in a week
GOP Leadership Consider Leak Probe
The Associated Press

Tuesday 08 November 2005

Washington - Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist and House Speaker Dennis Hastert are circulating a draft letter calling for a congressional leak investigation into the disclosure of secret US interrogation centers abroad.

The Washington Post reported Nov. 2 on the existence of secret US prisons in Eastern Europe for terrorism suspects. The Bush administration has neither confirmed nor denied that report.

"If accurate, such an egregious disclosure could have long-term and far-reaching damaging and dangerous consequences, and will imperil our efforts to protect the American people and our homeland from terrorist attacks," stated the draft.

The Associated Press obtained a copy of the draft request to Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Pat Roberts of Kansas and his House counterpart, Intelligence Committee Chairman Peter Hoekstra of Michigan.

Frist and Hastert said the joint probe by the House and Senate intelligence committees should determine who leaked the information and under what authority.

"What is the actual and potential damage done to the national security of the United States and our partners in the global war on terror?" the draft letter asked. "We will consider other changes to this mandate based on your recommendations."

Frist's and Hastert's offices declined immediate comment.

The letter says the leaking of classified information by employees of the US government appears to have increased in recent years, "establishing a dangerous trend that, if not addressed swiftly and firmly, likely will worsen."

"We are hopeful that you will be able to accomplish this task in a bipartisan manner given general agreement that intelligence matters should not be politicized," it added.

The Post story of a week ago said that the CIA has been hiding and interrogating some of its most important al-Qaida captives at a Soviet-era compound in Eastern Europe, as part of a covert prison system set up by the agency four years ago that at various times has included sites in eight countries. The eight, said the story, include several democracies in eastern Europe.

-------



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (5495)11/9/2005 2:00:40 PM
From: Skywatcher  Respond to of 9838
 
the laughing is gonna start....SOON
GOP's Best Friend Could Be Its Nightmare
By Jeff Shields
The Philladelphia Inquirer

Monday 07 November 2005

Lobbyist Jack Abramoff helped fuel conservative successes, but his dealings could lead to powerful ethical fallout.

Washington - Lobbyist Jack Abramoff was not at the Senate Indian Affairs Committee hearing last week, but he was the central topic, as Congress continued to probe what some call one of this generation's most outrageous political scandals.

It was J. Steven Griles' turn to testify Wednesday, but it could have been any number of people.

Griles, a former Interior Department deputy, was called to address suggestions that Abramoff had improperly influenced his federal work. Griles, who denies wrongdoing, is just the latest in a line of Republican officials and conservative leaders to be linked to Abramoff, who has been accused of mocking the laws that govern money and influence in American politics.

The hearing was a sharp reminder that while White House aides Karl Rove and I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby dominate the headlines, Abramoff remains - according to some observers - the Republican Party's most dangerous problem.

"I don't think we have had something of this scope, arrogance and sheer venality in our lifetimes," Norman J. Ornstein, resident scholar at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, wrote recently. "It is building to an explosion, one that could create immense collateral damage within Congress and in coming elections."

Abramoff and his friends are some of the biggest players in the conservative revolution that took over Congress, the White House, and the lobbying industry.

Former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, who once called Abramoff one of his "closest and dearest friends," has requested a House ethics investigation to clear his name relating to trips he took at Abramoff's expense; DeLay has said he thought the trips were paid for by other sources.

Christian Coalition founder Ralph Reed, antitax guru Grover Norquist, members of Congress, administration officials, and a host of lobbyists have been drawn into Senate or Justice Department investigations of Abramoff's lobbying activities.

It goes on: Abramoff and a business partner were indicted in Florida in August on charges of fraud and conspiracy for their 2000 purchase of a gambling-boat fleet.

Former White House official David Safavian has been indicted on charges that he lied about his Abramoff ties and has pleaded not guilty. Rep. Bob W. Ney (R., Ohio) has been subpoenaed by a grand jury investigating Abramoff and is himself under federal criminal investigation on suspicion of taking bribes in the form of campaign contributions. Ney has denied wrongdoing.

Because Abramoff was so close to the power structure and fund-raising mechanisms of the Republican Party, "he knows where a lot more of the bodies are buried," said Bill Allison, spokesman for the Center for Public Integrity, a nonpartisan ethics watchdog group.

"Abramoff goes to the much broader issue of how the Republicans have held their majority together," Allison said.

Abramoff, who was president of National College Republicans in the early 1980s, wrote and produced a B movie and once organized a meeting of anticommunist guerrillas and mujaheddin in Africa, became one of Washington's most powerful influence peddlers when Republicans took over Washington in 1994.

He opened a restaurant, Signatures, and leased skyboxes at sports arenas, where he held fund-raisers. According to documents released by Senate investigators, he directed his clients - often unregulated entities that included U.S. territories, Indian tribes and Internet gaming clients - as to how much and where to direct their political contributions.

Abramoff invoked Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination when called before the Senate Indian Affairs Committee last year. Through a spokesman, he denies wrongdoing.

"Mr. Abramoff is put into the impossible position of not being able to defend himself in the public arena until the proper authorities have had a chance to review all accusations," spokesman Andrew Blum said in a statement. "Any fair reading of Mr. Abramoff's career would show that his clients benefited immensely from the hard work he and his team did on their behalf."

Thousands of e-mails subpoenaed by Senate investigators indicate a man who was publicly dedicated to conservative ideals while privately committed to enriching himself. His public descent began before the Indian Affairs Committee in September 2004, where he and partner Michael Scanlon, DeLay's former press secretary, were found to have charged Indian tribes more than $66 million while privately referring to their clients as "monkeys" and "troglodytes."

"What sets this tale apart, what makes it truly extraordinary, is the extent and degree of the apparent exploitation and deceit," Sen. John McCain (R., Ariz.), chairman of the Indian Affairs Committee, said at one of four hearings he has used to shame Abramoff over the past year.

Chairman Kevin Sickey of the Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana, one of Abramoff's aggrieved clients, testified Wednesday that the e-mails also offered a rare glimpse into the legal "underworld of government affairs."

"He is the golden-boy-gone-bad of the American political system," said Sickey, whose tribe paid Abramoff and partner Scanlon more than $32 million over three years.

Senate hearings and published reports have alleged that Abramoff and Scanlon often charged their tribal clients for work they never performed; paid to fly members of Congress and their staffs to places such as Saipan in the Northern Marianas Islands and Scotland, a violation of ethics rules; and secretly hired Reed with tribal gaming money to shutter a rival casino in the name of Christian family values. When Abramoff's gambling business venture in Florida went sour, a business rival was slain. Abramoff was not implicated, but two men hired by Abramoff's business partner are charged with the killing.

Abramoff, a major fund-raiser for the Republican Party, was a "pioneer" for President Bush, meaning he raised at least $100,000 for the 2004 campaign, and his clients gave much more. He boasted of access to White House deputy chief of staff Karl Rove, dined with Interior Secretary Gail A. Norton, and hired away key members of DeLay's staff as his lobbying partners.

"The Congress and the United States Government became Jack Abramoff's personal playground," said Rep. George Miller (D., Calif.), who has long complained of Abramoff's influence in the Northern Marianas Islands, a U.S. territory that Abramoff helped keep free from U.S. minimum-wage and immigration laws. "But Abramoff was only able to succeed because he had willing partners within the Congress and this administration."

The Abramoff story "is breathtaking in its reach," McCain said at Wednesday's Indian Affairs hearing, before leaning on witnesses, including former Interior Department deputy Griles, with gusto.

That same day, Griles was called to answer questions about why, according to Norton's former chief counsel, he suddenly became interested in a decision on whether the Jena Band of Choctaw Indians - a potential competitor of Abramoff's clients, the Louisiana Coushattas - would be permitted open a casino in 2002. E-mails showed that Abramoff, at the time, was channeling $250,000 from the Coushattas to an environmental nonprofit formed by Norton before she became Interior secretary, and now run by a friend of Griles'.

"I was alarmed that Mr. Griles had an inexplicable desire to become involved in this particular decision," said Michael Rossetti, Norton's former counsel. Rossetti said he challenged Griles, asking, "Whose water was he carrying?" - and Griles backed down.

Griles said he didn't recall being so interested and was "confused" by Rossetti's testimony.

In the end, the testimonies of Rossetti and Griles stood in direct conflict, but the 318 pages of e-mails had provided another revealing day, courtesy of Jack Abramoff.

"I've learned so much today," Griles said. "I'm really disappointed in what I've learned about today."

Abramoff's Circle

Lobbyist Jack Abramoff is under investigation by at least three federal agencies and two Senate committees for his dealings with members of Congress, their staffs, and his clients. Much of the evidence has come from e-mails released to Senate investigators by Abramoff's former lobbying firm. Here are some of the main characters in the Abramoff inquiry:

Rep. Tom DeLay

DeLay called Abramoff "one of my closest and dearest friends" and was allied with Abramoff in populating the lobbying industry with former Republican staff members, including his own. DeLay has requested that the House ethics committee look into three trips he made that were paid for by Abramoff or his clients.

David Safavian

A former lobbying partner of Abramoff's, Safavian was chief of staff of the General Services Administration before he was arrested Sept. 19 and charged with lying to federal investigators about his dealings with Abramoff. He has pleaded not guilty.

Rep. Bob W. Ney

The Ohio Republican, who chairs the House Administration Committee, which oversees campaign finance, has been subpoenaed by the federal grand jury investigating Abramoff in Washington. Abramoff organized a golfing trip to Scotland for Ney in 2002. Ney has denied any wrongdoing.

Michael Scanlon

A former press secretary for DeLay, he partnered with Abramoff in a lobbying/public-relations business that took in more than $82 million from 12 American Indian tribes between 2001 and 2003. He has refused to testify before the Senate Indian Affairs Committee, which is investigating whether he and Abramoff defrauded Indian clients and their gambling operations out of tens of millions of dollars.

Ralph Reed

Former executive director of the Christian Coalition and now a candidate for lieutenant governor of Georgia, he was paid by a Louisiana tribe to rally Christian opposition against competing tribal casinos. Reed said he did not know his efforts were being funded by Abramoff's gaming clients, but Abramoff's e-mails indicate otherwise.

Grover Norquist

President of the antitax group Americans for Tax Reform and a leading conservative activist, he received a subpoena from the Senate Indian Affairs Committee for records related to his dealings with Abramoff. The subpoena came after Abramoff's e-mails showed that he sometimes funneled money from his tribal gaming clients through Norquist's group to hide its source.

Sen. Conrad Burns

The Montana Republican helped Abramoff's client, the wealthy Saginaw Chippewas of Michigan, land $3 million in federal funding intended for impoverished tribes after the Department of the Interior determined that the tribe did not qualify. Two of Burns' staff members later joined Abramoff's lobbying team.

Timothy Flanigan

President Bush's nominee for the Justice Department's No. 2 position, he withdrew his name from consideration after questions about his relationship with Abramoff when he was corporate counsel for Tyco International Ltd. Flanigan testified that Abramoff bragged of his access to Karl Rove, the White House deputy chief of staff, and DeLay when Abramoff was lobbying for Tyco.

Adam Kidan

A disbarred lawyer, he partnered with Abramoff to buy SunCruz Casinos, a Florida gambling-boat empire built by businessman Konstantinos "Gus" Boulis. Kidan and Abramoff were indicted in August for mail and wire fraud in the $147 million purchase in 2000. Boulis was killed six months after the sale.

Anthony Moscatiello

He has been charged with conspiracy to murder Boulis. Moscatiello, who was friends with Kidan, and his daughter were paid at least $145,000 by SunCruz when it was controlled by Kidan and Abramoff.

--------

Contact staff writer Jeff Shields at 610-313-8173 or jshields@phillynews.com.



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (5495)11/9/2005 2:02:13 PM
From: Skywatcher  Respond to of 9838
 
real soon
Lawmaker From Ohio Subpoenaed in Abramoff Case
By James V. Grimaldi and Susan Schmidt
The Washington Post

Saturday 05 November 2005

Rep. Robert W. Ney notified Congress yesterday that he had been subpoenaed by a federal grand jury examining the lobbying activities of Jack Abramoff, making the Ohio Republican the first lawmaker to receive such a demand in the expanding influence-peddling investigation.

The subpoena, delivered to Ney in recent days, seeks records and testimony from his office. His spokesman, Brian Walsh, said it is the first contact Ney has received from federal investigators looking at Abramoff, once one of Washington's most powerful lobbyists. Ney has denied any wrongdoing.

"I voluntarily provided information to the Senate Indian Affairs Committee last year and I have offered to make myself available to meet with the House Ethics Committee," Ney said in a statement yesterday. "I believe, however, that although the government's investigation of Mr. Abramoff has been well-publicized through other sources, it is inappropriate for my office to comment in any detail about an ongoing investigation."

Under House rules, members must announce subpoenas, and they are then reported in the Congressional Record. Ney received the subpoena earlier in the week, but it was not announced to the House until yesterday. Walsh said that "we do not believe that there would be any grounds" for Ney to be a target of the investigation.

Ney has received campaign contributions from Abramoff and has accepted favors, including dinners at the lobbyist's downtown restaurant, a fundraiser at the lobbyist's MCI Center box, and a golfing trip to Scotland in August 2002, according to public records, e-mails, interviews and documents obtained by The Washington Post.

As chairman of the powerful House Administration Committee, Ney promised to add legislation to a bill to reopen a casino for a Texas Indian tribe that Abramoff represented. After Ney agreed to prepare the legislation, Abramoff directed tribal officials to make three contributions totaling $32,000 to Ney's campaign and political action committees. A Ney spokesman recently said that money has been donated to Ohio charities.

In 2000, Ney placed comments in the Congressional Record favorable to Abramoff's purchase of a Florida gambling company, SunCruz Casinos. Ney has said he was not fully informed by the lobbyist. Abramoff and business partner Adam Kidan were indicted in August on fraud charges related to the purchase.

Federal prosecutors in Florida are investigating Ney's role in the SunCruz deal, according to people familiar with the probe who spoke on condition of anonymity. The grand jury that subpoenaed Ney is based in the District.

Ney also approved a 2002 license for an Israeli telecommunications company to install cell-phone antennas for the House. The company later paid Abramoff $280,000 for lobbying, according to lobbying disclosure forms. Records obtained by The Post show the firm also donated $50,000 to a charity that Abramoff sometimes used to secretly pay for lobbying activities. Walsh said that although Ney had the authority to make the antenna decision on his own he asked a group of wireless companies to select the contractor. Walsh said Ney's actions were not based on any connection to Abramoff.

Abramoff stated in an e-mail to tribal officials that "our friend" - later identified in Senate testimony as Ney - sought the Scotland trip after he agreed to help Abramoff's Texas Indian clients. Abramoff then arranged for the charity, the Capital Athletic Foundation, to pay for the trip. Ney said in a statement a year ago that Abramoff told him that going on the trip would help support a charitable organization through meetings the lobbyist organized through Scottish Parliament officials.

Another public official has come under scrutiny for the Scotland trip. David H. Safavian, then chief of staff at the General Services Administration, also went on the trip with Ney, Abramoff and former Christian Coalition leader Ralph Reed. Safavian, who went on to become the chief White House procurement officer, was indicted last month on charges that he lied to investigators looking into the Scotland trip when he said Abramoff had no business before his agency.

Ney's official report to Congress listed a purpose of the trip as "speech to Scottish Parliamentarians." However, there is no record of Ney's speech in the Scottish Parliament's register of official visits. In addition, at the time of Ney's trip, the Scottish Parliament was out for its August recess, spokeswoman Sally Coyne said.

Although no other lawmakers have been subpoenaed in the Abramoff investigation, Julie Doolittle, wife of Rep. John T. Doolittle (R-Calif.), and a company controlled by the husband of Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.) have received subpoenas from the grand jury.

-------



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (5495)11/9/2005 3:51:32 PM
From: Proud_Infidel  Respond to of 9838
 
And this guy is the "expert"?

Bomb expert blows himself up
news24 ^ |

Indonesian security forces raided the suspected hide-out of one of Asia's most wanted terrorist suspects on Wednesday, fighting a gun and grenade battle with militants inside.

The al-Qaeda-linked terrorist leader was either shot to death or blew himself up to avoid capture, officials and news reports said.

Azahari bin Husin, a Malaysian accused of masterminding at least four deadly blasts in Indonesia in recent years, was believed to have been killed in the operation in Malang, a town about 850km east of Jakarta, senior police official General Gorries Mere told The Associated Press.

Local TV stations reported Azahari, who security officials have said always wore explosives around his waist to avoid being captured alive, blew himself up during the operation.

Major operation

"We suspect it is him," said Mere, Indonesia's deputy chief of detectives. He cited "men in the field" as the source of the information.

An elite anti-terror police unit raided the suspected terrorist hide-out in Malang, on Java island, at around 16:00 on Wednesday, Mere said.

Witnesses told the SCTV network they heard two explosions and gunfire before police moved in on the house that was harbouring suspected terrorists. The roof was blown off the house, according to Jakarta's Metro TV news station.

Local military commander Major General Syamsul Mapparepa said those inside the hours "were putting up stiff resistance, and were throwing grenades," state news agency Antara reported.

Officials say Azahari, aged in his 40s, is a key member of the al-Qaeda-linked terror group Jemaah Islamiyah.

Together with fellow Malaysian Noordin Mohamed Top, Azahari is accused of direct involvement in four deadly terrorist attacks in Indonesia, including the 2002 Bali bombings that killed 202 people.

Authorities had no immediate information about whether Noordin was among those involved in Wednesday's operation, though officials have said the two men usually traveled apart.

Indonesian officials named the two Malaysians as the suspected masterminds of last month's triple suicide attack on the same resort island last month that killed 20 people. Major General Ansyaad Mbai, a top Indonesian anti-terror official, confirmed that a major anti-terror operation was under way in Malang targeting Azahari and his group.

He said he did not know whether Azahari was killed. One policeman was shot and injured, he said.



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (5495)11/10/2005 10:37:05 AM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9838
 
Andrea Mitchell: I 'Misspoke' on Plame ID

NBC's senior diplomatic correspondent Andrea Mitchell is claiming that her comments have been deliberately distorted in reports covering a 2003 interview where she said Valerie Plame's identity had been "widely known" before her name appeared in a Robert Novak column.

"The fact is that I did not know [Plame's identity] before the Novak column," she told radio host Don Imus on Thursday.

"I said it was widely known that an envoy had gone [to Niger]," she insisted. "I said we did not know who the envoy was until the Novak column."

But the actual exchange in question shows that Mitchell was questioned specifically about Plame's CIA employment, not her envoy husband.

"Do we have any idea how widely known it was in Washington that Joe Wilson's wife worked for the CIA?" she was asked by host Alan Murray in an Oct. 3, 2003 interview on CNBC's "Captial Report."

Mitchell replied: "It was widely known among those of us who cover the intelligence community and who were actively engaged in trying to track down who among the foreign service community was the envoy to Niger. So a number of us began to pick up on that."

Confronted with her comments Thursday morning, the top NBC reporter insisted: "[The quote] was out of context."

When pressed, a flustered-sounding Mitchell explained: "I - I - I said it was widely known that an envoy had gone - let me try to find the quote. But the fact is what I was trying to say in the rest of that sentence - I said we did not know who the envoy was until the Novak column."

Moments later, however, Mitchell changed her story, saying she was talking about both Plame and Wilson:

"I said that it was widely known that - here's the exact quote - I said that it was widely known that Wilson was an envoy and that his wife worked at the CIA. But I was talking about . . . after the Novak column."

"That was not clear," she finally confessed, before admitting, "I may have misspoken in October 2003 in that interview."

Her acknowledgment prompted Imus to remark: "It took me a minute to get that out of you."

Still, despite her admission, Mitchell blamed partisan "bloggers" for distorting her comments:

"We've got a whole new world of journalism out there where there are people writing blogs where they grab one thing and ignore everything else that I've written and said about this. And it supports their political view."

The full exchange went like this:

IMUS: Apparently on October 3, 2003, you said it was "widely known" that Joe Wilson's wife worked at the CIA.

MITCHELL: Well, that was out of context.

IMUS: Oh, it was?

MITCHELL: It was out of context.

IMUS: Isn't that always the case?

MITCHELL: Don't you hate it when that happens? The fact is that I did not know - did not know before - did not know before the Novak column. And it was very clear because I had interviewed Joe Wilson several times, including on "Meet the Press."

And in none of those interviews did any of this come up, on or off camera - I have to tell you. The fact is what I was trying to express was that it was widely known that there was an envoy that I was tasking my producers and my researchers and myself to find out who was this secret envoy.

I did not know. We only knew because of an article in the Washington Post by Walter Pincus, and it was followed by Nicholas Kristof, that someone had known in that period.

IMUS: So you didn't say it was "widely known" that his wife worked at the CIA?

MITCHELL: I - I - I said it was widely known that an envoy had gone - let me try to find the quote. But the fact is what I was trying to say in the rest of that sentence - I said we did not know who the envoy was until the Novak column.

IMUS: Did you mention that Wilson or his wife worked at the CIA?

MITCHELL: Yes.

IMUS: Did you mention . . .

MITCHELL: It was in a long interview on CNBC.

IMUS: No, I understand that. But at any point, in any context, did you say that it was either widely known, not known, or whether it was speculated that his wife worked at the CIA.

MITCHELL: I said that it was widely known that - here's the exact quote - I said that it was widely known that Wilson was an envoy and that his wife worked at the CIA. But I was talking about . . .

IMUS: OK, so you did say that. It took me a minute to get that out of you.

MITCHELL: No, I was talking about after the Novak column. And that was not clear. I may have misspoken in October 2003 in that interview.

IMUS: When was the Novak column?

MITHCELL: The Novak column was on the 14th, July 12th or 14th of '03.

IMUS: So this was well after that?

MITCHELL: Well after that. That's why the confusion. I was trying to express what I knew before the Novak column and there was some confusion in that one interview.

IMUS: Who'd you find it out from? Russert?

MITCHELL: I found it out from Novak.

IMUS: Maybe Russert's lying?

MITCHELL: You know Tim Russert doesn't lie.

IMUS: Which would break little Wyatt Imus's heart, by the way.

MITCHELL: Well, which has not happened. But this is (unintelligible). We've got a whole new world of journalism out there where there are people writing blogs where they grab one thing and ignore everything else that I've written and said about this. And it supports their political view. And . . .

IMUS: Bingo.

MITCHELL: Bingo.