Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (146308)	11/9/2005 10:51:08 AM
From: Lane3	Respond to of 793955

Opinion My opinion Leonard Pitts Jr.: When 'liberal' is a 4-letter word My opinion Leonard Pitts Jr. Tucson, Arizona \| Published: 11.09.2005 advertisement Would you mind if we talk about Geena Davis again? In another column, I spent a few minutes discussing her new TV show, "Commander In Chief," in which she plays the first female president. My aim was to explore what this said about changing gender roles, but that wasn't how Frank, a reader of mine, took it. We had a brief exchange by e-mail, which I share with you now in its entirety: Frank: "Commander In Chief" is about a liberal female president. What is new? Hollywood loves liberals. Hollywood does not understand conservatives. Me: Just out of curiosity, what, precisely, has Geena Davis' character done that has marked her as a liberal? Frank: She is a liberal. I'm reading that and I'm like, Oookay. But based on what? Has she introduced a bill to make abortion mandatory? Presided over a same-sex wedding on the South Lawn? Swapped Ronald Reagan's portrait for Jesse Jackson's? Or is liberalism something you can just "tell," the way some people say they always know when somebody's gay? Hey, I'm willing to concede the possibility that Frank is correct. But off the top of my head, I can't recall anything the fictional president has done that gives much of a clue to her political leanings, right, left or sideways. Yes, the villain of the show is the Republican speaker of the House. On the other hand, the late former president, who was apparently beloved by all, was also a Republican. My aim here is to critique what passes for political discourse in this country, particularly insofar as it involves what the first President Bush used to call "the L word." That was 15 or more years ago. I'd argue that in the intervening years, the L-word has become the new N-word. No, I don't mean that those who use it are bigots, but rather, that it has come to be used in much the way racial epithets are used, connoting a state of inherent defect so obvious as to require no further explanation. What else was meant when talk-show host Michael Savage named his book "Liberalism is a Mental Disorder"? Somewhere, I'm sure, "Mr. You Liberals" is pleased. That's the name a colleague and I gave an otherwise anonymous fellow who used to rant on our voice mails. I was awed by the guy's ability to cast absolutely any topic in terms of liberal inferiority. "Naturally, you liberals support the infield fly rule," he would rasp. Or, "Only you liberals would choose paper over plastic." Or, "Tastes great! Only one of you liberals would fall for 'less filling!' " I exaggerate less than you think I do. For him, as for so many others, "liberal" is the catchall explanation for Everything Wrong, one-size-fits-all terminology for Those Who Disagree. It's as if the vitriol of our politics over the last 15 years or so has robbed the very words we use to describe it of meaning. Or, perhaps more accurately, as if they now mean whatever we need them to in a given moment. So that we use the L-word (and increasingly, the C-word) the way we use all words of opprobrium and scorn. As if, having said this, you need say nothing else. Nor even explain yourself further. Which must be convenient, but "convenient" is not a synonym for "right." So I wish some of us would stop pretending that shouting "liberal" is a way to explain reasoning. From where I sit, it's a way to avoid it. Contact Leonard J. Pitts Jr. of The Miami Herald at lpitts@herald.com.

To: Lane3 who wrote (146308)	11/9/2005 1:02:35 PM
From: unclewest	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793955

DOVER, Pa. -- In a school board fight that focused on intelligent design, voters in Dover, York County, kicked out all eight incumbents, each of whom supported the district's current intelligent design policy. Burying religion is key to the liberal left's master plan. They know they cannot be pro religion, pro abortion, and pro sodomy simultaneously. The mix is just too volatile. The latter two are primary goals, So what we get is an anti-religion stance that is presently attempting to bury intelligent design, prayer in school and at government functions, and the Ten Commandments. Meanwhile they fight like hell for free abortions and gay rights. And so far, the liberals are winning.