Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: iggyl who wrote (48620)	11/11/2005 12:16:25 PM
From: golfinvestor	Respond to of 196393

Deleted.

To: iggyl who wrote (48620)	11/11/2005 1:10:25 PM
From: bdog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 196393

Making an example of the leaders/instigators, possible redemption for the rest.

To: iggyl who wrote (48620)	11/11/2005 3:44:29 PM
From: saukriver	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 196393

Of the group of six bringing complaints against Qualcomm why has Q targeted only Nokia and Broadcom? Why not Ericisson for instance? Q is just being prudent. Q is not required to assert its complaint against all. In fact, it would be a needless litigation expense to sue 6 companies when suing just 1 gets your point across. (Why fight with 5 extra sets of lawyers?) I suspect that Q identified Nokia because it has been the most stubborn and resolute at not compensating Q for what Q feels is its IP.