Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: paret who wrote (712759)	11/12/2005 2:28:27 PM
From: Geoff Altman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

paret, you're welcome to exercise your right to ignore me at any time. You aren't the only one on this thread and it's obvious from the replies to my posts that others are interested in this topic. I'll freely drop this topic when people stop asking me questions that I feel obligated to try and answer in the best way I know how. Also I'll freely reply to others that post opinions on this issue. There's nothing in the thread guidelines that says you can't talk about this war on drugs and the collateral damage it's causing. It's one of the most important social issues of the last 40 years. This issue is directly related to Bush and more precisely the republican party at large since Nixon started the drug war. You're obviously entrenched in your position and had no intention of honest debate to begin with so why don't you just bow out and stop pretending? The only thing that you're intent on is pointing out 2 people that have contributed money to getting marijuana laws reformed which is a pretty specious argument if you consider that an argument at all. I'm really surprised that you didn't learn your lesson after my reply to your AIM article. I might also suggest that you've been losing the argument since you started replying to my and others posts and that is readily apparent to lurkers and others. I can see how this frustration might affect you being that you like to act as the thread enforcer. So either learn enough about this issue to debate it rationally or don't reply to me or others when we post on this issue.