SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tonto who wrote (69750)11/13/2005 2:31:55 PM
From: SkywatcherRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
Pentagon Papers' Ellsberg Sees a New War, Same Lies
Critic of Vietnam conflict, 1971 whistleblower says 'history is repeating itself' in Iraq
by Sarah N. Lynch


MAPLEWOOD -- For 74-year-old Daniel Ellsberg, who is best known for his leading role in leaking the Pentagon Papers to The New York Times in 1971, the war in Iraq, the workings of the Bush administration and the Valerie Plame leak all feel like déjà vu.

The Bush administration is possibly 'the worst administration in our history,' Daniel Ellsberg, source of the Pentagon Papers, told NJ Peace Action at a luncheon at Columbia High School in Maplewood on Saturday. (Danielle Austen/Daily Record)
"History is repeating itself to an extent," he told a packed audience of NJ Peace Action members during the organization's annual soup luncheon at Columbia High School on Saturday.

Ellsberg cited numerous parallels between the war in Iraq and the war in Vietnam and also urged Americans to stand up against an administration that he deems to be possibly "the worst administration in our history."

At times, his observations on the incidents drew gasps from the audience and at other moments laughter -- particularly when he accidentally said the name of Scooter "Libby" instead of G. Gordon "Liddy."

He then corrected himself, but he implied with a laugh that his mistake is really not that far off the mark.

In both an exclusive interview with the Daily Record and during his speech on Saturday, Ellsberg recalled his first day and night at the Pentagon in 1964 --the day of the United States' first air raids against the North Vietnamese.

The raids were in response to an alleged attack by the Vietnamese against U.S. destroyers in the Tonkin Gulf. That attack prompted Congress to delegate its constitutional power of war and peace to the president.

But the Tonkin Gulf attack never really occurred, he said, just as Joseph Wilson never discovered yellowcake uranium in Africa.

"The bottom line is we were lied into this war as much as we were lied into Vietnam in very similar ways," Ellsberg said. "In fact, it's becoming apparent that the documents on which they based their claim that there were WMDs in Iraq were actually forged."

"In short, in both cases, the administration took indications that were very ambiguous and uncertain and lied about them by saying they were unequivocal and precise, and they misled the Congress and misled the American people."

The Pentagon Papers revealed to the American people that the war in Vietnam was basically un-winnable. Ellsberg sat on this secret for quite a number of years until one day, he decided he was going to photocopy the entire 7,000-page report and give it to Congress. When Congress did nothing with it, he distributed it in 1971 to The New York Times and other newspapers -- leaking a secret that the Nixon administration wanted to keep under wraps.

The next day the Nixon administration put an injunction on the Times and began making plans to go after Ellsberg for his actions.

Smear campaign

To counter the Ellsberg leak, the Nixon administration set out to leak information about Ellsberg to embarrass him in the press, he said. The CIA broke into his psychoanalyst's office searching for information about him.

At this point in his speech, Ellsberg drew laughter from the audience as he imitated the voices of former President Richard M. Nixon and former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger recorded onto the infamous White House tapes. The conversations he imitated for the audience were predominantly conversations that Nixon actually had with aides about Ellsberg at the time.

"Don't you agree we have to pursue the Ellsberg case now?" Ellsberg said in Nixon's gruff, scratchy voice. "Let's get that (expletive) into jail."

"We've got to get him ... We must destroy him in the press."

What is currently happening to Joseph Wilson and his wife, former CIA operative Plame, are mirror images of his situation, Ellsberg said.

Also like the war in Vietnam, Ellsberg said Iraq too is an un-winnable war, but with a lack of Democratic leadership and with the workings of the Bush administration, there does not appear to be an end in sight.

"I think it will be a long time before we get out of Iraq, very long, with Democrats or Republicans. The democratic base would be glad to see us out, as I would ... That does not mean we are going to get democratic leaders who are going to give up those bases in Iraq in the midst of the oil fields," Ellsberg said. He later criticized U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., for advocating to send more troops there.

Many in the audience said they agreed.

"We cannot win this type of battle with well-trained, highly technical troops," said Norma Elliott of Warren.

"You can compare it to the Revolutionary War. The Redcoats were marching with bright red uniforms. They had cannons and the best guns, and we won because we had an insurgency. We were hiding -- shooting from the trees."

While the House is predominantly made up of Republicans, making impeachment for Bush virtually impossible, Ellsberg urged the audience not to give up. Democrats in the Senate must call for investigations into everything from prewar intelligence to the questions surrounding Bush's election victory in Ohio last year, he said.

He also laid out a list of what be believes are Bush's plans for the remaining three years of his term -- plans that could become successful should the United States sustain another terrorist attack.

"If there's a terrorist attack, I think the president will get what he wants, and here's what I think he wants. This is my belief. I believe that what he wants is a new Patriot Act that's already been drafted, I feel sure, that will make this Patriot Act look like the Bill of Rights," said Ellsberg, who lives in California and spends his time lecturing and writing about his experiences.

Militarism threat

Other possible goals that Ellsberg believes are in the minds of the administration also could include resorting to military rule on our own soil, imposing a draft on men and women and launching attacks on Syria and Iran.

"This may be the first public revelation to date that there is an ominous cloud approaching, meaning a metamorphosis in our democracy," said Alex Lemski of Hanover.

"History is repeating itself due to the ambition of power. That's the bottom line."

Toward the end, Ellsberg credited people like Richard Clarke for going to the press to reveal secrets, but he also criticized both those whistleblowers and himself for waiting until it was too late.

"Don't do what I did," he said. "Don't wait until another war has been started against Iran and Syria."

Copyright © 2005 The Daily Record



To: tonto who wrote (69750)11/13/2005 3:33:05 PM
From: SkywatcherRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
and bush...'speaks' Spanish!AHAHAHAHAHA
Bush got nada ...
# The '90s romance between the U.S. and Latin America is over. Washington had lost interest in the region even before Venezuela's leftist president spit on us.

By Michael Shifter and Peter Hakim, Michael Shifter and Peter Hakim are vice president for policy and president of the Inter-American Dialogue, respectively.

IT IS TEMPTING to take a look at the sorry state of U.S.-Latin American relations and conclude that we would all be better off if north and south went their separate ways. This month's singularly unproductive Summit of the Americas in Mar de Plata, Argentina, can be seen as sufficient proof that the impasse on such critical questions as trade is impossible to overcome. Such a view, however, would be a serious misreading of the interests at stake in both the United States and Latin America.

Public opinion polls in the region show that Latin Americans, rich and poor, are deeply critical of U.S. leadership and fervently disapprove of U.S. policies in the hemisphere and worldwide. Overwhelmingly, they dislike President Bush. And they distrust Washington, alternately charging the Bush administration with constant bullying and chronic neglect.

ADVERTISEMENT
For its part, the U.S. government is disillusioned with Latin America and seems to have lost any interest it once had in the region. It can't seem to move on what Latin Americans want most — reduced agricultural subsidies, more liberal immigration laws, greater social investment and bigger development projects. Latin Americans, in turn, are indifferent to what Washington desires most — reliable partners in the war on terrorism, allies to contain the fiercely anti-American Venezuelan president, Hugo Chavez, and more open markets for trade and foreign investment. The gap in agendas and priorities has rarely, if ever, been greater.

It's thus easy to understand why many say that if Washington were even more disengaged than it is today, Latin America would benefit. The region would then be free to pursue its real interests without Washington exerting its heavy-handed influence on what it has long regarded — dating to the Monroe Doctrine of 1823 — as its strategic preserve. This is the view that the oil-rich Chavez propagates at every opportunity.

Even if U.S. withdrawal were feasible, however, the consequences for the region would not be benign. Latin America would lose some access to the world's largest market and the most important source of investment capital and technology. It is hard to see how this would help reduce poverty and produce more jobs, the region's most urgent priority.

A Washington-less Latin America would not contain the region's spreading criminality. Although the U.S.-led war on drugs has largely failed, eliminating all U.S. assistance programs would not lessen the demand for drugs in the United States, Brazil (the second-largest consumer of cocaine) and Europe that continues to drive the market. Substantial U.S. support to Colombia has shored up its besieged government and helped avert a "failed-state" scenario.

Despite the rift between Washington and Latin American capitals, most governments in the region are interested in working with the United States. At last week's summit, Mexican President Vicente Fox urged his fellow presidents to remain committed to building a Free Trade Area of the Americas. Central American and most Andean governments embrace this goal. Even Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay and Paraguay, which resisted U.S. pressure to set a trade-talk timetable next year, hope Washington will get serious about reducing agricultural subsidies so more of their products can reach U.S. markets.

Washington still may be tempted to marginalize Latin America further. That would be a mistake. The United States and Latin America are more economically interconnected than ever. Their value systems are highly compatible. The vast majority of Latin America's governments are committed to market economies and liberal democracies. U.S. exports to the region total more than $150 billion a year, comparable to our trade sales in the European Union. And Latinos are the largest ethnic minority in the U.S. The major problems facing us — drugs, health, the environment and security — will only worsen if we lack the cooperation of our neighbors.

Unfortunately, repeated misunderstandings and resentments make the U.S.-Latin American relationship unnecessarily — and tragically — tortured. The message Bush and senior officials should have taken from the summit is how urgent it is for the administration to devote serious attention to Latin America and seek to rebuild the trust that, over the past decade, has all but evaporated.



To: tonto who wrote (69750)11/13/2005 3:37:13 PM
From: SkywatcherRespond to of 81568
 
Ahhhh....those great FORGIVING CHRISTIANS! and of course from KANSAS...the new laughing stock of the WORLD
Town says goodbye to son who paid ultimate price
Tyler MacKenzie killed last week outside Baghdad
Click here to view a larger image. Evan Semon © News

Members of the honor guard of the 101st Screaming Eagles Airborne Air Assault, out of Fort Camble, Ky., finish folding the flag that draped the casket of Pfc. Tyler MacKenzie, 20, who was killed by a roadside bomb in Iraq on Nov. 2. The flag was given to the soldier's mother during a service Friday. MacKenzie was a graduate of Greeley West High School.

By David Montero, Rocky Mountain News
November 12, 2005
GREELEY - The green uniforms stood erect and stone- faced - not allowing a shred of emotion to break their ranks. Blinks were rapid, but lips were drawn tight and eyes stared straight ahead. Always straight ahead.

Even when the casket was pulled from the hearse.

This was their time - the time to bury a soldier killed last week by a roadside bomb near Baghdad. The time to honor one of their own through wailing bagpipes, a mournful bugle and a volley of rifle shots. The time to look the MacKenzie family squarely in the eyes and thank them for the sacrifice made on behalf of a grateful nation.

Pfc. Tyler MacKenzie, all of 20, was buried in Sunset Memorial Gardens on Friday afternoon. Veterans Day.

The tall kid eulogized as being shy, friendly, courteous, honest and hardworking. The soldier who died living up to his family's proud military history. The boy who was killed days before becoming a legal adult.

"From the time he was 2, he wanted to be like his father and join the Army," remembered -Keith Lorimer, a young men's leader at the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Greeley. "Now he's gone from one mission to another. He's gone from serving his country to serving his Lord."

Close to 1,000 people packed the church to honor MacKenzie, who was in the 101st Airborne Division.

Outside, were another 100 holding American flags and standing next to a legion of motorcyclists clad in leather chaps and denim jackets honoring the dead veteran.

They helped block the sight and sounds of a handful of protesters from a Kansas-based anti-gay church hurling insults at the MacKenzies while standing on American flags.

The group, followers of Fred Phelps, had a 15-minute permit to protest before being escorted away on a day when the rest of the nation was honoring the military. The protesters don't claim MacKenzie was gay, only that he died for America and that America supports homosexuals.


Their verbal insults were drowned out by the flag-bearing citizens who sang patriotic songs while bikers fired up their motorcycles and revved their engines.

MacKenzie's grandfather, a 68- year-old Navy veteran, could scarcely comprehend the protesters.

Instead, he and his family focused on what else they saw along the route between the church and the cemetery - children holding American flags outside a school, MacKenzie's football team standing on the corner wearing their powder-blue jerseys and old veterans saluting in crumpled jackets and wearing hats heralding distant wars.

"That was something," Ron Borland said. "It's like the whole community came out for Tyler."

MacKenzie was Borland's only grandson, and during the graveside service, he wept while "Taps" was played.

The emotion caught up with him again when Julie MacKenzie, Tyler's mother, was handed the folded American flag.

Borland rested his head on his wife's shoulder, the sobs shaking his entire body. David MacKenzie and Emmett MacKenzie - Tyler's father and grandfather - just held a level gaze at the silver casket.

Many others will miss MacKenzie. When he was a student at Greeley West High School, he volunteered in the office as an aide and developed a close rapport with Annette Onarto and Lanell Adler, who worked in the main office.

Onarto was overwhelmed with memories of MacKenzie, recalling how his 6-foot-7 frame didn't always fit underneath doorways and how he would offer to adjust the vents in the office when it got too warm for her.

"That was just Tyler," she said. "Always thinking of others."

At the memorial service in the church, Tony Holloway spoke of the same traits, remembering a 2003 trip to Wyoming to follow the pioneer trail, when he offered to pull his own cart as well as those of the women in the group.

Now it was MacKenzie who needed help.

Six pallbearers, marching slowly, carried him Friday. The kid who wouldn't join the Army until he felt he was physically ready and who grilled recruiters with questions until "he knew more about the Army than most of my recruiters," said Capt. Patrick Knight.

Knight was there Friday to say goodbye to his recruit. So were legions of others in the green uniforms. They stood erect and saluted.

And, not for the last time, his mother cried.