Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (69774)	11/14/2005 2:35:42 AM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

What I know is that "Clintons" economy fell down badly before he left office, dooming either a President Bush or Gore to suffering from a loss of previously expected federal tax revenues. There's the rub, and one noted by economists witnessing the Nasdaq fall, prior to Bush taking office. Now, I want federal spending slashed to the bone. It isn't surprising that Bush hasn't helped much if at all to accomplish that, and I have no reason to suspect Gore would have either, nor any other Democrat or Republican Presidential Candidate, for that matter. Re: "please explain who's going to pay off his trillions in new deficits. How, when and who? If you have no answer, you lose the debate." How foolish are you? I'm a Libertarian. What debate? LOL. I didn't vote for Bush in 2000, and I certainly can't lose a debate in which you falsely imply I have taken a position which I simply have not. While I don't believe you understand the importance of slashing spending, I also would never claim increasing deficits are a good thing. Did you see above where I said "Bush hasn't helped....?" That statement directly applies to the deficit. Take it to the bank. Dan B.