Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: James Calladine who wrote (48575)	11/13/2005 9:43:26 PM
From: geode00	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 361203

I'm not saying that things couldn't have happened in one way or the other, I'm saying that I don't see sufficient evidence to believe in a widespread conspiracy theory. I do believe that the disaster of 911 should be laid squarely at the feet of the government but, even with all of the warnings and with a supposed global war afoot, other countries have been hit although on a much smaller scale. We are dealing with a government that couldn't handle a slow moving hurricane and, even while they were being screamed at about the desperation in NO, STILL didn't take action. Until there is more evidence, I will believe in incredible incompetence (since it's exhibited daily by this administration) over brilliant conspiracy. Did they see trouble coming out of Saudi Arabia and ignored it? Possibly. Did they take advantage of 911 to the detriment of the country? Absolutely. Did they engineer a brilliant broad daylight explosion-plane-missile attack on two cities whose plot still hasn't been uncovered? Possibly but I doubt it. If they're this brilliant, why is Iraq so messed up when they really wanted to govern it and privatize the oil?