Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ahhaha who wrote (45425)	11/14/2005 2:18:16 PM
From: mishedlo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 110194

I can only read what you write. If you refer to my link to St Louis and claim MZM is a joke, I can only infer you don't trust St Louis' published data. St Louis has been the preferred provider for this data for 30 years and provides it to some of the other branches. Then I can only conclude you are reading challenged. In fact, it is obvious that you are. My statements MZM is a total joke as for determining money supply. M2 is fatally flawed as well. Have nothing to do with trusting the data and any person that could understand basic sentence construction concepts would fully understand the meaning of "as for determining money supply". Not only is MZM fatally flawed, your reading comprehension is. Yes I misspelled "determining" originally but I do not think that should affect the comprehension to a normal person. I have no problem with you quoting what I say. Given your track record, however, it might be best (for everyone) if you try not inferring anything from it. If you wish to disagree about the use of MZM, you are more than welcome to, but I prefer to believe Shostak over you. The bottom line is clear (at least to me), MZM horribly double counts some components of money supply. I do not know about you, but that makes the figure useless and fatally flawed to me. Mish