SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: haqihana who wrote (712931)11/14/2005 8:32:21 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
"Buddy, You are right about the reason for the boom during the Clinton administration,"

Eh? I don't believe I addressed that question at all in my post. Perhaps you misread it?

"but there was another participant that caused the market to soar."

No kidding: the absolute FLOOD of liquidity ('fiat money') unleashed by the Federal Reserve and Alan Greenspan (remember the run-up to Y2K?). Not to mention the 'free pass' given to corporations to 'print money' through accounting fraud (claiming tax deductions for stock option grants, while being allowed to pretend that these grants WERE NOT expenses and did not water the stock when it came time to file their annual reports). A cabal of bought and paid for Senators and Representatives (Lieberman, Breaux, Dodd, etc.) are WHOLELY RESPONSIBLE for striking this match that began the asset inflation bubble of the 'nineties. They fought the accounting reform movement (the N.A.S.B, Clinton's Treasury Department under Rubin, the S.E.C. under Arthur Levitt, the Federal Reserve under Alan Greenspan, the I.A.S.B., etc., etc.) until the hide-bound forces for corruption won the day, and accounting reform (enabling Enron, Anderson, etc.) was KILLED.

There likely would have been no asset bubble (despite the surge in liquidity), or else the bubble would have been much smaller, if the accounting reformers had won.

"All of the damage was done before GWB took office."

LOL! Plenty of *new damage* been done since....



To: haqihana who wrote (712931)11/14/2005 9:03:49 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Respond to of 769667
 
Necessinflation

11/07/05
by The Mogambo Guru

"Greenspan is the opposite of what a competent central banker is supposed to do! If he really were a good central banker, none of these bad "crisis" things would have happened in the first place!"

dailyreckoning.com