SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (69805)11/14/2005 2:59:50 PM
From: Dan B.Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
Blah blah blah. And the Nasdaq collapse surely was never bound to affect the budget, either.

Re: "It would have corrected and leveled out no matter who was president after 2000. And it did."

HUH? Aren't we forgetting something? LOL. The ensuing drop in the other markets which took place prior to anything "Bushy" taking effect, wasn't bound to affect the budget for whatever President either I suppose. LOL

You are deep in the propaganda soup here. That market swings affect every administration is indeed the point. This was a big event, perhaps NOT to be blamed on a President, and certainly not Bush, who, well, either wasn't President yet or hadn't yet done a thing to affect what took place. But you'll go on merrily pretending it's all his fault. LOL. Meanwhile, as you note, it all began to turn around on Bush's watch. Whatever the cause, you'll say Bush botched it. LOL...you are simply not credible, and neither are your sources, IMHO.

DEEP in the soup you are.

Dan B.



To: American Spirit who wrote (69805)11/14/2005 3:20:54 PM
From: tontoRespond to of 81568
 
Why did deficits increase every year? Run AS run...

He ended up in his last year with a whopping 225 billion surplus. That has never been achieved before.