Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

SI - Site Forums : Silicon Investor - Legacy Interface Discussion (2004-2011) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Boopa who wrote (4062)	11/15/2005 12:31:57 PM
From: SI Dave	Respond to of 6035

Looking good to [long] investors has never been a criteria. Maybe it looks great to short investors? Users of the site, including moderators, are free to express their beliefs and opinions in board descriptions as long as it is done in accordance with the Terms of Use.

To: Boopa who wrote (4062)	11/15/2005 12:51:58 PM
From: Original Mad Dog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6035

Are thread titles and descriptions supposed to "look good" to investors? Actually, that one only asks two questions, one suggesting it may be bad ("Is it a scam?") and the other suggesting it may be good ("Is it new and revolutionary?"). Your short posting history on SI consists solely of pumping this stock and complaining to Dave that somebody else isn't on board with your point of view. Let's explore this company's financials for a second. The market capitalization is $40.43 million. Its current assets (cash and inventory) are only $622,000. Total revenue in the last period was $4,000. Research and SGA expenses were about $5 million. Maybe typical for a start up, high risk uncertain reward. Top three execs hold millions of shares combined, also typical. The ticker symbol, using a soft "c", sounds like "sexy". Hmmm. The thread header seems like it expresses a reasonable range of possible opinion. Unless your viewpoint is that "opinions" are what somebody else believes and "facts" are what you believe.