Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (5377)	11/16/2005 10:11:39 AM
From: Dale Baker	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 543106

To continue with an economist's view on torture, a simple cost/benefit analysis for the torturer and the victim ignores some major indirect costs for a superpower like the US. If we say that torture should be illegal yet we find ways to do it when necessary, we pay a huge price in credibility. Why should anyone believe our firm, principled stands on any dimension of human rights if we selectively ignore our own so-called principles? One of the huge dangers of the last four years has been the attitude, we will maintain the highest American ideals except when we think we can't afford to. That's not what the Founding Fathers had in mind. They wanted an end to arbitrary executive power and action, not enshrining it in ongoing policies, IMHO. A second cost is increasing the motivation and willingness of potential terrorists to want to inflict pain on us when they see the American government openly practicing torture. A third cost is losing the active support of our allies (such as they are) if they don't agree on our selective use of torture. Breaking the rules in a unilateral fashion pushes us deeper and deeper into unilateralism by default. So we end up with Samoa in the coalition of the willing and China telling Bush to take a hike when he criticizes their lack of democracy. And so on and so on....