SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Galirayo who wrote (126139)11/17/2005 12:27:44 AM
From: skinowski  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 209892
 
Interesting question. That chart reflects the action of 40 trading days - and those are the same 40 days whether you look at daily candles, or compress the intraday data. Often, more detailed charts may add insight. I think in this case we are able to see that the down and up moves were "three-wavers" - which is suggestive that the entire construction is corrective in nature, and therefore the eventual resolution is likely to be bullish. I say "likely", because there is no certainty -- but still, it is a nice piece of evidence to be able to put on the scale.

Everyone keeps looking for the "correct" count. That is a fiction... we can only recognize a "correct" count after the fact. The important thing is to be good at estimating probabilities - and, very importantly, to be able to recognize early on when the theory is wrong and needs to be changed.

I think that Elliott Waves tend to become less useful at both extremes, very small - and very large. Small wiggles will cause more (small) whipsaws, but very large counts are not practical either, because it may take too long to get the answers. Robert Prechter is a great expert, but he is a good example of how costly it may become if one gets involved too deeply with some particular version of the Very Big picture.

edit - chart in question:
stockcharts.com[p,a]ecclyyay[d40][pb50!b200][vc60][ilp14,3,3][J55205563,Y]&listNum=1