Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend.... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: paret who wrote (15854)	11/17/2005 10:54:41 AM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35834

I thought the last 2 paragraphs of that article were quite revealing. <<< Think about this from the president's point of view: Much of the country is calling for your head regarding your alleged failure to prevent 9/11 when no firm intelligence predicted such a thing. Do you really have any choice but to act on the overwhelming amount of clear evidence that says bad things are happening beneath hidden bunkers in Iraq? No. You have no other way out than to fight preemptively. If you don't, well, heaven forbid another attack is made on American soil--with grotesque weapons that came out of Iraq after sanctions were lifted and Saddam's WMD program was reconstituted (as the Duelfur Report later extrapolated). At his impeachment trial, shortly before conviction, the president would have been made to endure a verbatim recitation of the many dire warnings about Iraq and Saddam Hussein uttered by Democrats Ted Kennedy, Nancy Pelosi, Al Gore, Bill Clinton, Sandy Berger, and Madeline Albright. "Iraq is a long way from [here]," Secretary of State Albright said on February 18, 1998, "but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." >>> Message 21893966

To: paret who wrote (15854)	11/17/2005 11:04:06 AM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35834

And yes, the complicity of the MSM, the NYT in particular, in placing their liberal agenda & hatred of Bush above national security is painfully obvious. They will never admit it, but they want us to lose in Iraq. And they don't want Bush to receive any credit for the successes there or in the greater war on terror. They are doing their best to intentionally deceive the American public. They are placing our national security at risk with their revisionist history, lies, slander, smears, distortions, omissions, misrepresentations, obfuscations & misleading propaganda. They are almost as bad as the DNC.