SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tommaso who wrote (147416)11/17/2005 3:44:24 PM
From: D. Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793838
 
It took a decade for Congress to lose Vietnam. It's taken them less than 4 to get around to it this time in losing Iraq. That's not an improvement.

Derek



To: Tommaso who wrote (147416)11/17/2005 3:54:38 PM
From: KLP  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793838
 
Yes, Hagle is a RINO. And Buchanan is hard right. Dean, Gore, Pelosi, Reid, Kennedy, Boxer, Kerry, Durbin, and all the etcs are Hard Left....If we took the extremes from each party, and they lumped themselves together, and the centerists from each side, formed a party, it would be a much more interesting situation.

Is that what you would suggest?

And BTW, Bush and Cheney and people like Kissinger (this morning on FOX) think the Democrats are NOT just questioning the Government....but that they are in fact, undermining our Military, plus telling outrageous lies. And of course, they slander and throw sound bites around, but NEVER have a shred of proof for any of their charges.

Stay tuned, you will see that yourself, and so will Hagle.



To: Tommaso who wrote (147416)11/17/2005 6:32:37 PM
From: MrLucky  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793838
 
What's the point of the Bold Print?



To: Tommaso who wrote (147416)11/17/2005 9:00:25 PM
From: Neeka  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793838
 
Bush has every right in the world to defend his policy in Iraq. And he didn't call anyone who opposes the war in Iraq unpatriotic, and I challenge you and/or Chuck Hagel to prove otherwise.

M



To: Tommaso who wrote (147416)11/17/2005 10:00:24 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Respond to of 793838
 
Well sometimes even a Republican can have some crazy desire to show they are dumber than a bag of hammers. Calling out those who ignore their own past positions and then clearly imply dishonesty in the President is not just a reasonable course of action by the President. It is a required course of action. Hagel stupidly cannot comprehend that and then stupidly attempts to represent it as "White House's new line of attack against critics of its Iraq policy"

hagel is self outed as an idiot on this one.