Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : IPMG - International Precious Minerals Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rrufff who wrote (335)	11/17/2005 5:26:32 PM
From: Nihontochicken	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 799

Just a passing thought ... What is the chance that the IPMG execs come up with change of direction and a new business plan of which they inform their PR firm, which then just happens to notice that this new plan is identical to that in a PR they've done or seen for another company, and so go ahead and plagiarize that PR for the IPMG announcement? Now, alternatively, what is the chance that the IPMG execs themselves decided to plagiarize a really cool PR they'd seen, and, if indeed the fact, then why did they do it? I mean, how much stupidity versus how much larceny? I have to think they screwed up and showed their true colors. Too scammy for me, the IPMG execs have totally negated any fundamental reason for owning this stock, and rendered it only a TA quickie. JMO, of course. NC

To: rrufff who wrote (335)	11/17/2005 5:34:59 PM
From: rrm_bcnu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 799

As I posted elsewhere, If it is a bogus company, then it is being manipulated and they will pump it up... If it is not a bogus company, then the merits of the survey will bring it up... What brokerage in their right mind would buy such volume if they really suspected it not to move up again? The stock was removed from the REGSHO list on the 14th, 1st trading day following that the bias reversed to downward. This may be due to the PR, but it may also just be MM manipulation. I suspect the latter, just like PLNI... rrm