Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: neolib who wrote (175219)	11/17/2005 8:04:58 PM
From: Orcastraiter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Perhaps it was a diversionary tactic. Perhaps there were no people on the planes. Perhaps they were guided remotely. The plane impact provides the cover for the implosion, and makes a good rational for war. Not to mention a tidy insurance settlement. It's no more believable than a guy in a cave in Afghanistan sending 19 young men with box cutters to hijack planes, after a night of hangin out in a strip bar...they piloted jets with pin point accuracy to their targets...when the flight instructors said the same men couldn't handle a Cessna 170. What are the odds of that happening? Orca