Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (175236)	11/17/2005 11:16:14 PM
From: mistermj	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Wow! There is hope here. Reason suddenly abounds.

To: bentway who wrote (175236)	11/18/2005 12:46:14 AM
From: Orcastraiter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

The pancake theory does not explain how the buildings collapsed in free fall time. If it were the case then the central core columns would have been left behind. We have three buildings. Two hit by aircraft, one not. All three buildings collapsed symmetrically into their foot print. How can you explain all three buildings falling in this manner. If a building collapses because of a weakened story, the upper part of the building will still collide with lower part, absorbing energy and taking up time. Something doesn't add up. Orca