Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RWS who wrote (53690)	11/18/2005 3:02:13 PM
From: jim black	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 206223

HA. lol, for ONCE I have no problem there agreeing with that presumed Chinese policy... Now on to more pertinent subject...I am asking for opinions and expertise from members of this excellent thread. I confess I spooked and entirely evacuated from energy stocks a short while back, exiting COP, ECA, CHK, XEC, SU, APA, taking some solace that after I sold all of them went down further, the least being XEC My nagging question I throw out to this board, why would someone NOT invest in Encana with their very rich and long lived NG and now tar sands as well. I personally do not trust our Congress, either party, not to go after the likes of XOM or even more so CHK or COP, but ECA is Canadian and NG has its own attractiveness...any opinions folks? What am I not seeing on ECA, or SU...I keep caressing the BUY button on the stock but have still not gotten back in. Jim Black