Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (147763)	11/19/2005 10:43:32 AM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793670

Whatever... google.com

To: Lane3 who wrote (147763)	11/19/2005 12:34:40 PM
From: D. Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793670

I should think it obvious why Murtha wouldn't vote for it Why not? That's exactly what he's calling for. We're fighting an insurgency in Iraq. You can't do that from Kuwait. He would set us and Iraq on a path to failure. Derek

To: Lane3 who wrote (147763)	11/19/2005 4:05:08 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793670

If Murtha say the War in Iraq is unwinnable. If Murtha give credence to the idea that soldiers in Iraq don't know why they are there and don't know who the enemy is then it is treason for Murtha to not vote to withdraw American forces immediately. If Murtha has expressed the above sentiments in the past and knew they were false it is also treason. What the scum terrorists know from the vote is that even with all kinds of idiotic ranting from elected members of the American Government, when the official opinion is asked, it's 400 to 3 to kick the asses of terrorists in Iraq. If that is only a political thing, I think it is a wonderful political thing. It's not going to make any happy terrorists. America stands 400 to 3 with President George W Bush and the American armed forces killing terrorists in Iraq.