Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (261393)	11/21/2005 12:31:38 AM
From: Elroy	Respond to of 1573746

I believe you're wrong....most American's are pro-choice. Now, tell me why, as a male, you think you have anything to say about it.? I think you're correct, most American's are pro-choice. If the Supreme Court ruling banning abortion were overruled I think you'd see abortions regulated, but not banned in most states. Red states would have more regulations, or perhaps outright bans, and blue states less. Then, as time progresses and the affects of the regulations/bans become known, the abortion laws would shift to better fit the desires of the electorate. As for why does a man have anything to say about it, that's the way the US system works! Non-military voters have a say about the usage of the US military, non-students have a say about public school funding, people in their 20's have a say about drug benefits for people in their 80's, and English speakers have a say about Spanish ballots. Just because you aren't in the affected group doesn't mean you don't get to vote on laws that affect the group.