SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jlallen who wrote (714555)11/21/2005 7:48:38 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
"Perjury, obstruction of justice, lying to a tribunal, etc. are never "personal" matters....."

I agree!

But, hey... you start out looking into a little backwoods land deal, (or the 'inadvertant' exposure of a C.I.A. agent who's spouse just so happens to be a critic), and... you never know what will turn up!

That seems to be the way these things go sometimes... they start a little investigation and it finds things and files unexpected charges.



To: jlallen who wrote (714555)11/22/2005 9:53:38 AM
From: cirrus  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Perjury, obstruction of justice, lying to a tribunal, etc. are never "personal" matters.....

It was a personal matter until Starr got involved. And exactly why did Starr get involved? What did Monica have to do with Whitewater? Overreaching by a a mile.

Factually incorrect. What Bush said was the Brit Intel had learned that SH was trying to buy uranium in Africa. The Brits stand by the report.

In his speech, Bush -- citing British intelligence information -- said Iraq was trying to buy uranium, which could be used to make nuclear weapons, in Africa. The White House concedes that information wasn't true.

Tenet said that at the time the speech was delivered, the line was factually correct because British intelligence did indeed believe that it had evidence of such activity. But he said the CIA's own investigation of those same allegations had led the agency to decide that that the evidence was inconclusive.

cnn.com

So, Tenet took the blame for something that was correct?

The CIA concluded that what Wilson found made it more likely to conclude that SH was after uranium.

Nope. See my earlier post and link. #714484