Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (175554)	11/22/2005 2:20:36 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

The fact that Saddam had not yet committed any attacks on the US is not a valid argument that we should have waited for him to do so. Saddam also tried to have a former US President killed. The fact that the plot(s) failed doesn't mean we should have regarded him as harmless and waited for him to get it right. Why doesn't the chimp declare a "war on auto collisions"? Thanks for refreshing your opposition to actively opposing terrorism aimed at our country. I appreciate you making your position so crystal clear. If they hurt us, we can glaze them like a doughnut. Ah, are we to believe you would favor use of atomic weapons if we are attacked again? This is not believable. We have been attacked and you are opposed to fighting terrorism even using conventional forces.