Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ChinuSFO who wrote (70798)	11/23/2005 6:31:52 PM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

Re: "I don't know what your attack means. You are responding to a post which says nothing about Chris Wallace." Exactly an example of my point. Your's was in response to a post by longnshort which excerpted Chris Wallace questioning Jay Rockefeller. Either your memory is short, of you are evasive as charged (but certainly falsely representing events above, by omission). It was illustrative of a point. You didn't respond to it. The issue concerned whether Bush could have lied and misled when Democrats somehow did not, if Democrats made like statements throughout. By the time you read Kerry claiming (after the start of the war) that he supported our action in Iraq from the beginning, you know that's true, for instance. Given this charge against Bush, there certainly ought be no complaint if the administration shows that he was not rowing a different boat than the Democrats, by and large, when we decided move on Iraq (in fact, per the congressional vote to allow it, especially if considering the uncooperative nature of the Saddam regime and all the information everyone believed). Worthy to note as I have, is that the evidence of something having been covered up in Iraq has become very extensive since our initial push, far more so than "proof" as to just WHAT was covered up). Speaking of how the war was prosecuted is not a response. By the time the men of that carrier Bush wore the flight jacket on decided to get a Victory sign put up signifying the completion of their own mission indeed, Democrats were still siding with the Presidents decision to move on an uncooperative Iraq. The reality of this timing supports the fact that Bush was little criticized and his action upon Iraq much accepted and respected by Democrats now shirking responsibility by suspiciously attacking Bush for doing what they in fact did themselves. This reality shows that the administration and the Congress shared a responsibility not only in representing the evidence to the American people, but in believing in our action in Iraq, truly, from the start. You did not address the point, and the post I'm responding to continues your change of subject instead. Dan B.